On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> (Blast from the past - got stuck from the time when Telecom NZ was
> fighting with a three day nation wide DSL outage. Just so you know what to
> expect should you consider moving here ;-)
>
> > > > All supported NCR53C9x SCSI host adapters for Amiga (
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:15:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Is there a ZorroID database in the kernel sources still?
I don't know about the kernel, but the package zorroutils should have it, i
think...
--
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/
(Blast from the past - got stuck from the time when Telecom NZ was
fighting with a three day nation wide DSL outage. Just so you know what to
expect should you consider moving here ;-)
> > > All supported NCR53C9x SCSI host adapters for Amiga (Cyberstorm,
> > > Cyberstorm II, Blizzard 1230 & 2060,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:52:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:41:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > > The current failure is here (for amiga, atari, maybe more):
> > >
> > > CC drivers/ide/ide-lib.o
> > > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c: In function `
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I'm wondering whether we should go to the platform driver framework on the
> > > rewrite (as jazz_esp.c did) as well. Can the presence of particular boards
> >
> > Yes, for those that matter (see below).
[snip]
> > So that leaves us with
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > be probed for at arch setup time (i.e. Zorro config data) so we only
> > > populate platform driver data for those boards actually present? The
> > > current probe code does not seem to guard against bus errors, either. Are
> > > the Zorro2 space ad
Hi,
> > I'm wondering whether we should go to the platform driver framework on the
> > rewrite (as jazz_esp.c did) as well. Can the presence of particular boards
>
> Yes, for those that matter (see below).
OK.
> > be probed for at arch setup time (i.e. Zorro config data) so we only
> > populate
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Kars said he can test on blz1260, I have a blz2060 (and a gvp series2
> > > which
> > > I don't really use for anything).
> >
> > Good to know. If I would find time, blz2060 would be the first driver to
> > tackle (as suggested by `wc -l' ;-)...
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:41:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > The current failure is here (for amiga, atari, maybe more):
> >
> > CC drivers/ide/ide-lib.o
> > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c: In function `ide_dump_atapi_status':
> > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c:601: internal compiler error: in
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > There is a clue hidden here for what the real problem is, maybe you can
> > solve the puzzle?
>
> Perhaps you have `CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-m68k"' in your .config?
Nope, but I think this is due to 133-arch.diff. I think it cros
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > There is a clue hidden here for what the real problem is, maybe you can
> > > solve the puzzle?
> >
> > Perhaps you have `CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-m68k"' in your .config?
>
>
> > Kars said he can test on blz1260, I have a blz2060 (and a gvp series2 which
> > I don't really use for anything).
>
> Good to know. If I would find time, blz2060 would be the first driver to
> tackle (as suggested by `wc -l' ;-)...
Now that's a metrics of complexity that needs some deeper anal
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Erm, that's the same driver as in A4000Ts and on the WarpEngine?
> No, A4000T and Warp Engine have a NCR53c7xx.
Ah, ok... I just remembered something with 53c..something... ;)
--
Ciao...
Ingo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > With the exception of the mac driver, we might be able to unify the
> > > various Amiga 53C9x variants (DMA handling being the main difference among
> > > them). Do we have te
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > With the exception of the mac driver, we might be able to unify the
> > various Amiga 53C9x variants (DMA handling being the main difference among
> > them). Do we have testers for all the variants of Amiga SCSI around?
> K
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:36:46AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > How close are we to releasing 2.6.25? I have yet to start on the ESP
> > > > rewrite ...
> > >
> > > As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:36:46AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > How close are we to releasing 2.6.25? I have yet to start on the ESP
> > > rewrite ...
> >
> > As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March.
>
> Fair enough. Even though it's just a microsecond on t
Hi,
> > How close are we to releasing 2.6.25? I have yet to start on the ESP
> > rewrite ...
>
> As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March.
Fair enough. Even though it's just a microsecond on the m68k time scale
:-)
With the exception of the mac driver, we might be able to
Hi Christian,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:48:01AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March.
>
> I am having some trouble keeping m68k up-to-date in the debian svn, is this
> alwa
Hey Geert,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:48:01AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March.
I am having some trouble keeping m68k up-to-date in the debian svn, is this
always the list of the latest patches?
http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~gee
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Did we have a fix for the gcc-4.2 build failure related to missing cache
> > > flush kernel defs? That it me again on hobbes now ...
> >
> > Patch is in 2.6.24-rc1 (commit e92042e5c009d84ba741ec4a978a13f260e6ee24).
> >
> > You can always manually fix
> > Did we have a fix for the gcc-4.2 build failure related to missing cache
> > flush kernel defs? That it me again on hobbes now ...
>
> Patch is in 2.6.24-rc1 (commit e92042e5c009d84ba741ec4a978a13f260e6ee24).
>
> You can always manually fix the build environment by plugging in
> include/asm-m68
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built
> > the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so
> > the default compiler on m68k is now gcc-4.2. It's a good time to update
> > the chroot.
>
> Did
> Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built
> the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so
> the default compiler on m68k is now gcc-4.2. It's a good time to update
> the chroot.
Did we have a fix for the gcc-4.2 build failure related to
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:30:06AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> I'd love to - does your friendly provider cover the greater Auckland area?
Arcor in Auckland? Would make sense, do you have trains down there? Then
maybe you have arcor ;-)
Sorry, I have no idea about providers in NZ...
> > re
Hi,
> > > Maybe uucp or bsmtp from gluck? Christian does something like that, I
> > > think.
> >
> > uucp I had thought above before, but that's so sixties :-) bsmtp I need to
> > ask Christian about when he resurfaces.
>
> Blub, I'm back from the snow;-)
Glad you made it back :-)
> No uucp or b
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> No uucp or bsmtp (what's that?) here. My friendly provider does not block
> any ports (except 80), can I convince anybody to switch? My server can
> receive email directly (cts-aahz and co redirect mail directly to the
> dyndns
> address of my server) and delivers fo
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:45:43AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > Re: access to hobbes: I'll set that up as soon as I have port forwarding
> > > on the firewall set up. hobbes still has one major drawback for external
> > > use: I can neither send nor receive mail via SMTP. Stupid Telecom
> > Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built
> > the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so
>
> It did.
And uploaded. 680 packages in the queue now... way to go!
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
> > Anyway, end of rant. It's building pwlib now. There's a perl build running
> > as well so it may be a bit slower than usually.
>
> Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built
> the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so
It did.
> th
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:51:07PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Note to self: when copying around chroots, remember to update
> /var/debbuild/apt.conf ... Sorry, I should have remembered that a lot
> sooner.
Yes, I'm not real thrilled with that bit of code. I haven't thought of a
real good rea
Hi,
> Update: only pwlib and wesnoth were not ready when we released about two
> hours ago... They can still make it for the next point release which is
> planned for the end of february... Thanks for making sure the
> oldstable-security packages were ready and doing an effort to get as
> up-to-da
Update: only pwlib and wesnoth were not ready when we released about two
hours ago... They can still make it for the next point release which is
planned for the end of february... Thanks for making sure the
oldstable-security packages were ready and doing an effort to get as
up-to-date as possible
> > So hobbes is the one listed as buildd_m68k? ;)
yep - me manually taking the package and messing up the user ID again :-(
> >
> > I noticed that wesnoth has two different failed logs showing, the latter
> > of which seems to have an invalid version.
>
> Yes, that's my fault, I'm looking into t
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 07:03:39PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> centericq and qt-x11-free are installed now! :-)
yeah!
> I'm building wesnoth as we speak on crest...
you're in! yeah again.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
centericq and qt-x11-free are installed now! :-)
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:12:02AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>>> oldstable:
>>> pwlib
>> needs-build
building
>>> wesnoth
>> needs-build
building
>>> hobbes barfed on it on the first
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:12:02AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > >>> oldstable:
> > > >>> pwlib
> > > >> needs-build
> > >
> > > building
> > >
> > > >>> wesnoth
> > > >> needs-build
> > >
> > > building
> >
> > hobbes barfed on it on the first go (forgot to patch sbuild). let's see
> > how t
> > >>> oldstable:
> > >>> pwlib
> > >> needs-build
> >
> > building
> >
> > >>> wesnoth
> > >> needs-build
> >
> > building
>
> hobbes barfed on it on the first go (forgot to patch sbuild). let's see
> how this attempt goes. If anyone else wants to beat me to it, have at it.
Still no go - same pr
> >>> The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
> >>> scheduled Dec. 26th:
>
> Due to some needed regeneration of files, the point release is a bit
> delayed (probable a couple of days)...
>
> >>> oldstable:
> >>> pwlib
> >> needs-build
>
> building
>
> >>> wesnoth
> >> need
Luk Claes wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
>>> scheduled Dec. 26th:
Due to some needed regeneration of files, the point release is a bit
delayed (probable
> > At least I believe we have two of our faster buildds in the
> > oldstable{-security} rotation. It doesn't, however, look like
> > m68k will be ready for the release on Dec. 26. Sigh. :(
>
> Ok, please try to make sure that at least the oldstable-security ones
> are taken care of if possible.
I
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
>> scheduled Dec. 26th:
>>
>> oldstable-security:
>> centericq
>
> needs-build.
>
>> qt-x11-free
>
> building on kullervo.
>
>> sam
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:56:47AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
> > scheduled Dec. 26th:
> >
> > oldstable-security:
> > centericq
>
> needs-build.
no
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
> scheduled Dec. 26th:
>
> oldstable-security:
> centericq
needs-build.
> qt-x11-free
building on kullervo.
> samba
building on crest.
> oldstable:
> pwlib
Hi
The following m68k builds are still missing for the point release
scheduled Dec. 26th:
oldstable-security:
centericq
qt-x11-free
samba
oldstable:
pwlib
vim (built on crest, though I don't have access anymore, and
configuration is broken beyond being able to just sent the signed
changes file)
45 matches
Mail list logo
