Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-12-08 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Scott Holder wrote: > Not sure if it counts... but I had a kind of duh moment and remembered I > have a Macintosh LC III in the closet. 68030, 68mb of RAM, and, > unexpectedly, a 68882 FPU in the socket! So I hooked up the HD that's > working nicely in the LC475 and decided

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-12-08 Thread Scott Holder
On 11/20/2013 8:05 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Looks like the same one as http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2013/10/msg00083.html The two backtraces have an awful lot in common. So it is safe to say that this is not hardware flakiness. And it would ap

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > That thread you linked to was about a crash on an "amiga 1200 + aca1232" > -- is that a 68030 too? Yep, first Google hit: http://www.vesalia.de/e_aca1232.htm Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's l

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-20 Thread Finn Thain
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Looks like the same one as > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2013/10/msg00083.html The two backtraces have an awful lot in common. So it is safe to say that this is not hardware flakiness. And it would appear that this crash has only showed

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Finn Thain dixit: >Beats me. I guess I'll have to try another compiler. Huh. Which one do you use? We use gcc-4.8 but patched heavily, and Mikael Petterson said he’d not use 4.8/4.9 just yet. bye, //mirabilos -- „Also irgendwie hast du IMMER recht. Hier zuckelte gerade ein Triebwagen mit der Au

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Finn Thain wrote: >> In Thorsten's config I noticed these: >> >> # CONFIG_SCSI_GENERIC_NCR5380 is not set >> # CONFIG_SCSI_GENERIC_NCR5380_MMIO is not set >> >> My Sarge said it was a 5380, perhaps this is my problem? No, SCSI_GENERIC_NCR5380 is for old PC ISA car

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Scott Holder
On 11/19/2013 5:53 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Scott Holder wrote: This booted great for me. It might just be placebo effect but I feel like it booted a fair bit faster than the last one. Modules seem great too. This actually let me get about half a second of working mouse in X b

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: > Unfortunately this didn't work for me (via Penguin, 32bit mode, new > filesystem), but I'm not clear on what what failed. > > The error screen: http://imgur.com/v4uS3ia > > Salient bit: > Data read fault at 0x in Super Data (pc:0x3e22c) >

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Patrick McCarthy
On 11/18/2013 2:40 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: The ARAnyM kernel and initrd you posted unfortunately didn't work, I put them in Penguin in 32bit mode and it hung at 'MacLinux ABCDEFGHIJK'. I've built a Mac-only 3.12 kernel that you or Scott may want to

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Scott Holder wrote: > This booted great for me. It might just be placebo effect but I feel > like it booted a fair bit faster than the last one. Modules seem great > too. This actually let me get about half a second of working mouse in X > before it froze up or something.

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-18 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Scott Holder wrote: > vbOn 11/18/2013 2:29 AM, Finn Thain wrote: >> >> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: >> >>> The ARAnyM kernel and initrd you posted unfortunately didn't work, I put >>> them in Penguin in 32bit mode and it hung at 'MacLinux ABCDEFGHI

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-18 Thread Scott Holder
vbOn 11/18/2013 2:29 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: The ARAnyM kernel and initrd you posted unfortunately didn't work, I put them in Penguin in 32bit mode and it hung at 'MacLinux ABCDEFGHIJK'. I've built a Mac-only 3.12 kernel that you or Scott may want to

Re: xz (was Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III)

2013-11-18 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Finn Thain dixit: > > >I don't know how much memory is needed by the "xz -0d" algorithm. The > >xz > > RTFM ;-) > > Preset DictSize CompCPU CompMem DecMem >-0 256 KiB 03 MiB

xz (was Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III)

2013-11-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Finn Thain dixit: >I don't know how much memory is needed by the "xz -0d" algorithm. The xz RTFM ;-) Preset DictSize CompCPU CompMem DecMem -0 256 KiB 03 MiB1 MiB -1 1 MiB 19 MiB

Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-17 Thread Finn Thain
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: > > The ARAnyM kernel and initrd you posted unfortunately didn't work, I put > them in Penguin in 32bit mode and it hung at 'MacLinux ABCDEFGHIJK'. I've built a Mac-only 3.12 kernel that you or Scott may want to test, just in case the regression re