> > So you want to bypass testing altogether, and instead upload to etch-m68k?
>
> Yes.
>
> The main problem with having our own "testing", as I see it, is syncing
> with the testing that already exists, and still being able to do
> sourceful uploads that are required for our arch-specific bugfixes
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:36:11PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
[...]
> > Later on, we talked about us not being part of etch, and what we could
> > do about that (basically, he asked me whether we were okay with him
> > dropping all m68k packages from stable once it released, which I
> > denied).
Hi,
> James Troup was at FOSDEM this weekend, and we talked a bit about the
> m68k situation there, amongst others. My first question was about the
> state of our buildd addition requests, and whether it was on purpose or
> so that none of them had been granted yet. He basically apologised for
> n
Hi,
James Troup was at FOSDEM this weekend, and we talked a bit about the
m68k situation there, amongst others. My first question was about the
state of our buildd addition requests, and whether it was on purpose or
so that none of them had been granted yet. He basically apologised for
not acting
4 matches
Mail list logo
