Re: Glibc maintainers sought for m68k, hppa

2006-05-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:21:46AM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote: > I knew I was going to volunteer for this sooner or later, so I guess > there's no time like the present. I'm not sure how much time I have to > dedicate the m68k/glibc, but any time is better than none, and I can > probably bang out ba

Re: Glibc maintainers sought for m68k, hppa

2006-04-12 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:21:46AM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote: > I knew I was going to volunteer for this sooner or later, so I guess > there's no time like the present. I'm not sure how much time I have to > dedicate the m68k/glibc, but any time is better than none, and I can > probably bang out ba

Re: Glibc maintainers sought for m68k, hppa

2006-04-11 Thread Adam Conrad
I knew I was going to volunteer for this sooner or later, so I guess there's no time like the present. I'm not sure how much time I have to dedicate the m68k/glibc, but any time is better than none, and I can probably bang out basic TLS support in a reasonable timeframe. Count me in. Spin me aro

Glibc maintainers sought for m68k, hppa

2006-04-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
In the upstream glibc repository, both M68K and HPPA ports have been moved into the separate "ports" repository. This means two things: - The core glibc maintainers will not update them when sweeping changes are made. This was already the case; they're just making it clearer. - ACLs