On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:44:47PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021007 13:51]:
> > > make CFLAGS='-O' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' \
> > > LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' bootstrap
> >
> > are you sure you want to use this CFLAGS?
>
> Is there anyt
* Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021007 13:51]:
> > make CFLAGS='-O' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' \
> > LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' bootstrap
>
> are you sure you want to use this CFLAGS?
Is there anything that really _has_ to go to CFLAGS for m68k?
I am currently using -O2 -fo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:02:42PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > I have attached some patches in case you want to play with it. The gcc
> > patch has also the effect to change cpu target default to 68020-60.
> OK, I'll give them a try. To summarize, I could use vanilla gcc 3.2 with a
> recent s
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:22:08AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to build gcc 3.2 from sources on Woody/m68k. I took the original
> > sources and diffs (as of 24.09.) from the debian pool directory and
> > manually applied all
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:22:08AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to build gcc 3.2 from sources on Woody/m68k. I took the original
> sources and diffs (as of 24.09.) from the debian pool directory and
> manually applied all the patches the debian build system would have
> applie
Hello,
I tried to build gcc 3.2 from sources on Woody/m68k. I took the original
sources and diffs (as of 24.09.) from the debian pool directory and
manually applied all the patches the debian build system would have
applied for m68k. Compilation with
make CFLAGS='-O' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' \
6 matches
Mail list logo
