Re: First package build on aranym

2006-11-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:03:03AM -0600, Tony Mantler wrote: > Hmm, helps if I remember to hit 'reply all' > > On 13-Nov-06, at 10:58 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:06:50AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote: > >>Michael Schmitz wrote: > >>>Nothing is ever perfect. Console you

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-11-14 Thread Tony Mantler
Hmm, helps if I remember to hit 'reply all' On 13-Nov-06, at 10:58 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:06:50AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote: Michael Schmitz wrote: Nothing is ever perfect. Console yourself with the thought that even Motorola got that page boundary crossing on e

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-11-13 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:06:50AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Michael Schmitz wrote: > >Nothing is ever perfect. Console yourself with the thought that even > >Motorola got that page boundary crossing on exceptions thing horribly > >wrong in their 040LC series :-) > > Really? Yes. You can't ru

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-11-10 Thread Petr Stehlik
Michael Schmitz wrote: Nothing is perfect, not even ARAnyM. I must admit that there was (yet another) MMU emulation error (pretty nasty to catch) this is in fact a CPU emulation omission. The original UAE CPU core was not designed with MMU in mind, it seems: https://lists.bobek.cz/pipermail/

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-11-10 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > This was a general dpkg failure that was fixed by downgrading dpkg to > > the Etch version (probably a FPU emulation bug). > > Nothing is perfect, not even ARAnyM. I must admit that there was (yet > another) MMU emulation error (pretty nasty to catch), that could > decrement the stack pointer w

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-11-09 Thread Petr Stehlik
Bill Allombert píše v Čt 19. 10. 2006 v 21:55 +: > > It should be compared to the buildlog on hobbes: > > > > > > It took approximatively 24 hours (wallclock time) so it is approximately > > 3 times slower, bu

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-11-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:26:59PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:12:51PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Since my setup is working well now, I offer to attempt to build others > > > packages you would like to try out. > > > > mozilla > > Maybe you means something

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-11-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:12:51PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Since my setup is working well now, I offer to attempt to build others > > packages you would like to try out. > > mozilla Maybe you means something else ? mozilla is not in etch and will be removed from sid so there is little

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-11-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Roman Zippel wrote: > I managed to build ghc6_6.4.2-2, but it really took ages, it uses the -x > option a lot, so the compiling happens on the local machine and to make it Do you know why distcc does local compiles if -x is specified? I noticed the same behavior in ccache a

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-31 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I managed to build ghc6_6.4.2-2, but it really took ages, it uses the -x > > option a lot, so the compiling happens on the local machine and to make it > > worse, it manages to trigger the 2.6 VM problems, so I had to compile it > > under 2.4. Using a lot of memory should also help (> 256MB) ot

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Some realy great news. > Since my setup is working well now, I offer to attempt to build others > packages you would like to try out. Here are a few suggestions: Times in s on amd64 just building (~ *90 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-31 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Arrakis crashed twice during the build of ghc6 as well, so I'd assume a > > more serious problem that results in crashes and is triggered by ghc6... > > I managed to build ghc6_6.4.2-2, but it really took ages, it uses the -x > option a lot, so the compiling happens on the local machine and to

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-30 Thread Mark Duckworth
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 20:27 +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > > Lets add firefox and perhaps ghc to that. My mac has network problems, > > > so using distcc there to build firefox is a no-go. And the amiga just > > > decided to crash after bu

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-30 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > Lets add firefox and perhaps ghc to that. My mac has network problems, > > so using distcc there to build firefox is a no-go. And the amiga just > > decided to crash after building ghc for four days. I am not sure if > > distcc would help ther

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-30 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Lets add firefox and perhaps ghc to that. My mac has network problems, > so using distcc there to build firefox is a no-go. And the amiga just > decided to crash after building ghc for four days. I am not sure if > distcc would help there, since it spends a lot of ti

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-30 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:12:51PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 06:42:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I have successfully build the pari package on aranym in 1 hour 51 minutes, > > (debuild -b -B build), using distcc+crosscc+NFS. > > Sweet! > > > Now if we w

Re: First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-30 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 06:42:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > I have successfully build the pari package on aranym in 1 hour 51 minutes, > (debuild -b -B build), using distcc+crosscc+NFS. Sweet! > Now if we want to go this route, we probably need to setup a system such > that gcc-cross is a

First package build on aranym+distcc+NFS

2006-10-30 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Debian 68k porters, I have successfully build the pari package on aranym in 1 hour 51 minutes, (debuild -b -B build), using distcc+crosscc+NFS. The log is available here: This was fully successful this time. (hobbes tak

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-10-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > It should be compared to the buildlog on hobbes: > > > > > > It took approximatively 24 hours (wallclock time) so it is approximately > > 3 times slower, but there is room for improvement. > > Actually that is

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-10-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > It should be compared to the buildlog on hobbes: > > > > > > > > > It took approximatively 24 hours (wallclock time) so it is approximately > >

Re: First package build on aranym

2006-10-19 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:20:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Dear m68k porters, > > I have almost successfully build a package (pari) on aranym. > The buildlog is there: > > > It should be compared to the buildlog on hobbes: >

First package build on aranym

2006-10-18 Thread Bill Allombert
Dear m68k porters, I have almost successfully build a package (pari) on aranym. The buildlog is there: It should be compared to the buildlog on hobbes: