On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 February 2006 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > You're talking about the Beta2 release here, right? As in, there's
> > still going to be a possibility to fix the release afterwards?
>
> Yes. Though missing a d-i release cann
On Monday 06 February 2006 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You're talking about the Beta2 release here, right? As in, there's
> still going to be a possibility to fix the release afterwards?
Yes. Though missing a d-i release cannot be good from a release
recertification point of view.
pgpqY6LlA
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> If these issues are not resolved before Beta2 is ready, this will probably
> mean hppa and/or m68k cannot be included in the release.
You're talking about the Beta2 release here, right? As in, there's still
going to be a possibility to
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Two ports are still on older 2.6 kernel versions: hppa (2.6.14) and m68k
> (2.6.12).
m68k 2.6.15 has been sitting in new for several days. Hopefully we'll
have soon.
> For m68k AFAICT the 2.6 kernel udebs are not actually used yet, so
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Two ports are still on older 2.6 kernel versions: hppa (2.6.14) and m68k
> (2.6.12).
> For hppa an update to current 2.6.15 is a requirement for inclusion in the
> release.
> For m68k AFAICT the 2.6 kernel udebs are not actually used ye
Almost all packages targeted for Beta2 have now been uploaded and so far
we've not seen any regressions.
The only package that currently looks like it will need another upload is
partman-auto-lvm in which some bugs were discovered during testing.
I will start moving udebs to testing this week,
6 matches
Mail list logo
