Hi,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383817
>
> That patch looks fairly m68k specific to my amateur eye. Or should it also
> fix the segfaults on other arches (s390, alpha, arm) where the build also
> failed?
Yes, it's m68k-specific, s
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > It was a bug in libgc and there is finally a new release, as soon as
> > it's installed it, it should work again.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Is there a bug#? In which version was it fixed?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383817
bye, Roman
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> During the builds of debian-installer for the last stable point release,
> you did tracing of the w3m segfaults during the building of the
> installation guide.
>
> I don't think I ever saw what the reasons were and if a BR was filed.
>
> As it is l
On Saturday 23 September 2006 14:26, you wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > It was a bug in libgc and there is finally a new release, as soon
> > > as it's installed it, it should work again.
> >
> > Is there a bug#? In which version was it fixed?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Saturday 23 September 2006 13:45, you wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > During the builds of debian-installer for the last stable point
> > release, you did tracing of the w3m segfaults during the building of
> > the installation guide.
>
> It was a bug in libgc and there is fin
(Please CC me; I'm not subscribed)
Hi all,
During the builds of debian-installer for the last stable point release,
you did tracing of the w3m segfaults during the building of the
installation guide.
I don't think I ever saw what the reasons were and if a BR was filed.
As it is likely that we
6 matches
Mail list logo
