Brian Barrett wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>> Please let us (ie Debian's openmpi maintainers) how else we can help. I
>> am
>> ccing the porters lists (for hppa, m68k, mips) too to invite them to help.
>> I
>> hope that doesn't get the spam filters going... I
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 04:03:44PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
...
> This makes implementing atomic functionality "interesting", to say
> the least. Carlos O'Donell has implemented some kernel helper routines
> to aide this, but that would tie the implementation to linux -- I don't
> know if you
On 14 July 2007 at 17:44, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
| On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 05:47:57PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 14 July 2007 at 16:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
| > | Dirk, it is extremely rude of you to cc a closed list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
| > | when posting to several open lists. Please
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 05:47:57PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 14 July 2007 at 16:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> | On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:26:22AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Hi folks,
> |
> | Dirk, it is extremely rude of you to cc a closed list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> | when pos
On 14 July 2007 at 16:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
| On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:26:22AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Hi folks,
|
| Dirk, it is extremely rude of you to cc a closed list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
| when posting to several open lists. Please do not do this in future.
Disagree strong
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:26:22AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi folks,
Dirk, it is extremely rude of you to cc a closed list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
when posting to several open lists. Please do not do this in future.
--
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
o
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:47:52AM -0600, Brian Barrett wrote:
> Open MPI uses some assembly for things like atomic locks, atomic
> compare and swap, memory barriers, and the like.
[...]
> We don't currently have support for a non-assembly code path. We
> originally planned on having one, but
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 01:16:42PM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
> Instead of failing at configure time, we might want to disable the
> threading features and the shared memory device if we detect that we
> don't have support for atomics on a specified platform. In a non
> threaded build, the
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:13:59PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 14 July 2007 at 10:47, Brian Barrett wrote:
> | Open MPI uses some assembly for things like atomic locks, atomic
> | compare and swap, memory barriers, and the like. We currently have
> | support for:
> |
> | We also have
On Jul 14, 2007, at 11:16 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
Instead of failing at configure time, we might want to disable the
threading features and the shared memory device if we detect that we
don't have support for atomics on a specified platform. In a non
threaded build, the shared memory device is
Instead of failing at configure time, we might want to disable the
threading features and the shared memory device if we detect that we
don't have support for atomics on a specified platform. In a non
threaded build, the shared memory device is the only place where we
need support for memor
Hi Brian,
On 14 July 2007 at 10:47, Brian Barrett wrote:
| On Jul 14, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > Please let us (ie Debian's openmpi maintainers) how else we can
| > help. I am
| > ccing the porters lists (for hppa, m68k, mips) too to invite them
| > to help. I
| > hope
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Methinks we need to fill in a few blanks here, or make do with non-asm
solutions. I don't know the problem space that well (being a
maintainer
rather than upstream developer) and am looking for guidance.
Either way is an option. There
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 14 July 2007 at 11:03, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
| On 7/14/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > i) that hppa (in the way configure sees it) is not supported:
| >
| > checking if .size is needed... yes
| > checking if .align directive takes
On Jul 14, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Please let us (ie Debian's openmpi maintainers) how else we can
help. I am
ccing the porters lists (for hppa, m68k, mips) too to invite them
to help. I
hope that doesn't get the spam filters going... I may contact the
'arm'
porters onc
On 7/14/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i) that hppa (in the way configure sees it) is not supported:
checking if .size is needed... yes
checking if .align directive takes logarithmic value... no
configure: error: No atomic primitives available for hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
make:
Hi folks,
The 'new' Open MPI packages for Debian that are maintained by a few of us via
a group on alioth.debian.org have now [1] reached the main distribution. This
means they are being built on all supported architecture and logs accumulate at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=open
17 matches
Mail list logo
