Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-07-08 Thread Roger Leigh
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:17:43AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >>

Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-07-08 Thread Roger Leigh
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:17:43AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >>

Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-07-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:17:43AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > found 340871 2.3.6-14 > >> > reopen 340871 > >

Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-07-03 Thread Roger Leigh
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> > found 340871 2.3.6-14 >> > reopen 340871 >> > thanks >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > Due to some crossed wires, proba

Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-07-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:02:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > found 340871 2.3.6-14 > > reopen 340871 > > thanks > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Due to some crossed wires, probably on my part, the fix for this bug > > was broken.

Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-06-29 Thread allomber
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > found 340871 2.3.6-14 > reopen 340871 > thanks > > Hi folks, > > Due to some crossed wires, probably on my part, the fix for this bug > was broken. The patch is in two parts: the __THROW define and the use > of __THROW. The current

Re: Bug#340871: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-06-18 Thread Roger Leigh
found 340871 2.3.6-14 reopen 340871 thanks Hi folks, Due to some crossed wires, probably on my part, the fix for this bug was broken. The patch is in two parts: the __THROW define and the use of __THROW. The current libc discards the first part and adds the second part instead of including both

Re: Bug #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h

2006-06-03 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, The attached patch file can be used directly in glibc to fix the build problems (debian/patches/m68k/local-mathinline_h.diff). This is the same as the previous patch, but defines __THROW. An alternative would be to include . I'll let you decide which is most appropriate. Regards, Roger -