Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src
Version: 5.9.1+dfsg-5
Followup-For: Bug #780430
User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hi!
Attaching an updated patch for 5.9.1+dfsg-5, please apply.
I will try to upstream everything next week.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :
On Sep 11 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Because m68k has a default alignment of 16-bit, not 32-bit. Hence sizes of
> structs often differ. It's part of the SysV ABI on Linux/m68k.
Actually, the SysV ABI for m68k defines a 4-byte alignment for int, but
Linux/m68k doesn't use (all of) t
On 09/11/2017 03:02 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
Patch in this bug no longer applies to the new version. Patch from webkit2gtk
package [2] applies with a slight change, but I still do not like the special
casing of struct sizes. Why are the sizes different on m68k?
Because m68k has a default alig
Hi Adrian!
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:02:50PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 04:00 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Correction: no, I can't forward it to *my* upstream: QtWebkit is not
> > developed
> > anymore.
> >
> > It needs to be accepted by WebKit
On Okt 17 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> If Andreas agrees, I'm happy to forward his patch.
Please do.
Thanks, Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On 10/17/2016 04:00 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Correction: no, I can't forward it to *my* upstream: QtWebkit is not
> developed
> anymore.
>
> It needs to be accepted by WebKit developers. I don't have the time for this,
> so please feel free to do it.
Ah, interesting. I
On lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016 3:20:49 P. M. ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Hi Andreas!
>
> On 10/16/2016 11:54 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> >> Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed)> .
> >
> > Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upst
Hi Andreas!
On 10/16/2016 11:54 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed)> .
>
> Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the
> license for it? I can't just blindy apply it without that info.
Could you a
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer dixit:
>Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the
>license for it? I can't just blindy apply it without that info.
Patches usually share the licence of the patched files;
as it is, there’s nothing copyright-relevant in it anyw
On domingo, 16 de octubre de 2016 10:05:30 P. M. ART Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer dixit:
> >Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the
> >license for it? I can't just blindy apply it without that info.
>
> Patches usually share the l
tag 780430 moreinfo
thanks
On viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016 4:25:14 P. M. ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attaching an updated patch by Andreas Schwab (CC'ed)> .
Andreas: did you made the patch? Has it been submitted upstream? What's the
license for it? I can't just blindy appl
Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src
Version: 5.4.2+dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #780430
Hi Lisandro,
please remember submitters don’t get bugmail… or ping them ;)
Anyway, here you are:
>- We need the original author of the patches.
The patches were written by myself.
>- We need the original author t
12 matches
Mail list logo
