Re: Bug#698315: [build] openmsx: FTBFS due to invalid alignment assumptions

2013-11-27 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I know that GCC will need the alignment attribute twice in structs, e.g. > > struct foo { > int bar __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); > int baz; > } __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); That's not true: the alignment of a struc

Re: Bug#698315: [build] openmsx: FTBFS due to invalid alignment assumptions

2013-11-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bas Wijnen dixit: >The assertion that fails is an alignment check, which means that forcing >the alignment the way you do should must have been ineffective. Any No idea, C++ is out of my depth. I know that GCC will need the alignment attribute twice in structs, e.g. struct foo { int ba