On Wed, 2003-07-09 09:29:14 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-07-09 00:22:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 2003-07-09 08:52:49 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-09 00:22:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > It would be *really* cool to have some D
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 09:29:14AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > For example:
> > I have an A3000 as my main television with my PicassoIV/PalomaTV combo... I
> > really would like to have a driver to use PalomaTV with Linux, but that?s
> > not possible atm. I can?t program the driver mysel
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-09 00:22:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > It would be *really* cool to have some Debian Text Centre. I know that
> > there are autobuilders avail
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-09 00:22:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It would be *really* cool to have some Debian Text Centre. I know that
> there are autobuilders available for all architectures, but they
> fullfill a diffe
On Wed, 2003-07-09 00:22:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Op di 08-07-2003, om 19:04 schreef John Klos:
>
> Due to our autobuilders, things are more or less in sync now; only when
> there are porting- or toolchain-issues, things get out of sync.
Op di 08-07-2003, om 19:04 schreef John Klos:
> Hi,
>
> > > I was more curious about the Debian OS project itself, not necessarily the
> > > packages project.
> >
> > I haven't read my Stallman lately, what is the Debian OS? Isn't it
> > GNU/Linux? GNU packages and Linux is the kernel. GNU/Hurd an
Hi,
> > I was more curious about the Debian OS project itself, not necessarily the
> > packages project.
>
> I haven't read my Stallman lately, what is the Debian OS? Isn't it
> GNU/Linux? GNU packages and Linux is the kernel. GNU/Hurd and and GNU/BSD
> are in the works afaik, you might want to as
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:54:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:41:19AM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:40:49AM -0400, John Klos wrote:
> > >
> > > I was more curious about the Debian OS project itself, not necessarily the
> > > pac
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:41:19AM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:40:49AM -0400, John Klos wrote:
> >
> > I was more curious about the Debian OS project itself, not necessarily the
> > packages project.
>
> I haven't read my Stallman lately, what is the Debian OS
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:40:49AM -0400, John Klos wrote:
>
> I was more curious about the Debian OS project itself, not necessarily the
> packages project.
I haven't read my Stallman lately, what is the Debian OS? Isn't it
GNU/Linux? GNU packages and Linux is the kernel. GNU/Hurd and and GNU/BS
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 22:17, John Klos wrote:
> Is one of the goals, stated or otherwise, of Debian to produce a
> consistent source tree which is the same version across architectures? If
> so, maybe there aren't that many m68k related problems.
>
> I suppose most of the work is going on in the a
> > Is one of the goals, stated or otherwise, of Debian to produce a
> > consistent source tree which is the same version across architectures?
>
> Debian packages for all arches are built from the same source. For a package
> to propagate from unstable to testing, it has to be built on all (curren
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:17:23PM -0400, John Klos wrote:
>
> Is one of the goals, stated or otherwise, of Debian to produce a
> consistent source tree which is the same version across architectures?
Debian packages for all arches are built from the same source. For a package
to propagate from u
Hi,
> > What's happening with the m68k port?
> > - debian-68k [1] has two posts so far this month.
>
> So? I guess this means no user has any problems with debian-m68k, the port
> is in perfect shape. Nothing wrong with that.
Is one of the goals, stated or otherwise, of Debian to produce a
consis
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:21:34PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> What's happening with the m68k port?
> - debian-68k [1] has two posts so far this month.
So? I guess this means no user has any problems with debian-m68k, the port
is in perfect shape. Nothing wrong with that.
> - debian-devel-
What's happening with the m68k port?
- debian-68k [1] has two posts so far this month.
- debian-devel-m68k-changes [2] doesn't seem to have had any posts since
March 18th this year (no new m68k packages?).
- debian-m68k-changes [3] just seems to collect spam.
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [4] doesn't seem
17 matches
Mail list logo
