On 5/12/2018 4:41 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I had that the wrong way - link order is not what matters here, the
> checks order has msdos before atari in fact.
Ok, I was going to say the dos table requires the 55AA signature that is
not expected to be found in an atari table.
One other thing I
Hi Adrian,
Am 12.05.2018 um 23:24 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 05/12/2018 10:41 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Do you have a dump of the root sector (plus additional eventual
extended
partition root sector) from these bugs?
>>>
>>> This is a very good point. We should have a
On 05/12/2018 10:41 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Do you have a dump of the root sector (plus additional eventual extended
partition root sector) from these bugs?
This is a very good point. We should have a look at the probing code in
the kernel because apparently the problem doesn't exist there.
Hi Adrian,
Am 12.05.2018 um 19:59 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 05/12/2018 01:17 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> The link order in the kernel (atari before msdos) has not been chosen at
>> random. The msdos partition format probe will always succeed on any
>> valid Atari partition table, w
On 05/12/2018 01:17 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> The link order in the kernel (atari before msdos) has not been chosen at
> random. The msdos partition format probe will always succeed on any
> valid Atari partition table, while Atari format probe should not succeed
> on plain MSDOS partitions.
>
Hi Phillip,
Am 12.05.2018 um 03:56 schrieb Phillip Susi:
> On 5/11/2018 11:29 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Thanks for digging this up. I wasn't aware of this particular issue before
>> and I agree, this needs to be addressed. I hope that I didn't cause too
>> many DOS partitions to be m
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 06:10:37PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> According to the documentation, p.43 [1], I think offset $01 should always
> contain either "GEM", "BGM" or "XGM". They don't seem to be optional.
The Atari partitioning tables are also used on the Q40/Q60 which breaks
m
On 5/11/2018 11:29 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Thanks for digging this up. I wasn't aware of this particular issue before
> and I agree, this needs to be addressed. I hope that I didn't cause too
> many DOS partitions to be misdetected. Sorry for the inconvenience if I
> did. The Atari p
On 05/11/2018 05:56 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
On 5/11/2018 11:29 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Thanks for digging this up. I wasn't aware of this particular issue before
and I agree, this needs to be addressed. I hope that I didn't cause too
many DOS partitions to be misdetected. Sorry for
9 matches
Mail list logo
