> > Well, it has been built by garkin and garkin is somewhat special,
> > because it's attached via serial link to the network.
>
> Neat!. In a weird way.
Imagine my feeling now that I'm watching xfree86 being uploaded via a
similar serial link. Weird doesn't even begin to descibe it.
Unfortunatel
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:13:56AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > The PTS says it's not built, and the package certainly does not show
> > up in mirrors. Does it need hinting, somehow?
>
> Well, it has been built by garkin and garkin is somewhat special,
>
> The following page seems to say that sawfish was correctly built
> in m68k on oct 14.
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sawfish;ver=1%3A1.3%2Bcvs20061004-1;arch=m68k;stamp=1160812332
>
> But this one has it in status needs-build
> http://cerberus.0c3.net/~buildd/package_status.php?arch=m68
> The following page seems to say that sawfish was correctly built
> in m68k on oct 14.
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sawfish;ver=1%3A1.3%2Bcvs20061004-1;arch=m68k;stamp=1160812332
That's the actual build log; it goes from whoever is handling garkin's
logs straight to the logs list.
>
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> The following page seems to say that sawfish was correctly built
> in m68k on oct 14.
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sawfish;ver=1%3A1.3%2Bcvs20061004-1;arch=m68k;stamp=1160812332
> But this one has it in status needs-build
> http://cerberus.0c3.net/~b
Hi there.
The following page seems to say that sawfish was correctly built
in m68k on oct 14.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sawfish;ver=1%3A1.3%2Bcvs20061004-1;arch=m68k;stamp=1160812332
But this one has it in status needs-build
http://cerberus.0c3.net/~buildd/package_status.php?arch=m68
6 matches
Mail list logo
