On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:54:41PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Another proposed solution would be the use of lvm snapshots to build the
> > packages in. Just lvremoving the snapshot would give you a clean chroot
> > again.
> Could be worth a try - no idea how much overhead lvm incurs and whe
Hi,
> > That really needs to be considered carefully, seeing as that keeping a
> > chroot as clean as possible has gone a long way to prevent install
> > dependency trouble in the past..
>
> Another proposed solution would be the use of lvm snapshots to build the
> packages in. Just lvremoving the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:36:07AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Having a smarter buildd queue is a long term goal and something that I
> > wouldn't burden on the shoulders of the m68k porters. I already made some
> > proposals to enhance the build process long ago. For example to not remove
>
Hi,
> Having a smarter buildd queue is a long term goal and something that I
> wouldn't burden on the shoulders of the m68k porters. I already made some
> proposals to enhance the build process long ago. For example to not remove
> all installed packages, just to install most of them right again,
Hi,
> > First off - is there any web site where I can get the status overview we
> > used to have on crest? May be time to revive crest's hourly package status
> > cronjob, if we can find it...
>
> Uhm, how about http://unstable.buildd.net/index-m68k.html then? ;)
Thanks, I knew I must have been
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:52:25PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:27:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>>
>>> Meanwhile, maybe we need to think about what a debian-m68k distribution
>>> should really have in it. We could probably release
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:55:02AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I think we can take care for about 4000 source packages, but ~7000 packages
> > is was too much, especially when some of the porters are always trying to
> > bring coldfire support in...
> Actually, we generally stay caught up
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:52:25PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:27:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > Meanwhile, maybe we need to think about what a debian-m68k distribution
> > should really have in it. We could probably release a lenny-m68k without
> > kde
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:27:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Meanwhile, maybe we need to think about what a debian-m68k distribution
> should really have in it. We could probably release a lenny-m68k without
> kde, gnome, mathematical packages, and some of the other large packages
> that
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:24:24PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Regarding the backlok - I had hoped to take down hobbes for a few days for
> kernel hacking, but that seems out of the question now?
We haven't been less than 800 needs-build for a month and we're not
likely to be without a fair a
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:24:24PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> First off - is there any web site where I can get the status overview we
> used to have on crest? May be time to revive crest's hourly package status
> cronjob, if we can find it...
Uhm, how about http://unstable.buildd.net/index-
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:25:14AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Regarding the backlok - I had hoped to take down hobbes for a few days for
> > > kernel hacking, but that seems out of the question now?
> >
> > The Needs-Build
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:25:14AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Regarding the backlok - I had hoped to take down hobbes for a few days for
> > kernel hacking, but that seems out of the question now?
>
> The Needs-Build queue indeed looks scaringly large...
Sorry, all my machines are off. The kerne
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Another question: I have persisting trouble on hobbes each time a
> documentation build attempts to pull XML schemas off the net. Has any of
> you found a solution for that?
Packages shouldn't require net access during their build process, filing
an RC bug might help? :-)
Sorry to be late to the party but I've been swamped with stuff at work.
Some answers, and some questions of my own:
First off - is there any web site where I can get the status overview we
used to have on crest? May be time to revive crest's hourly package status
cronjob, if we can find it...
>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > I fired up tanda again, but it has this problem:
> > >
> > > gcc-4.2: Depen
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I fired up tanda again, but it has this problem:
> >
> > gcc-4.2: Depends: gcc-4.2-base (= 4.2.2-3) but 4.2.2-4 is to be installed
> >Depend
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:07:37AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > We seem
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:07:37AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a
> > > good time to get
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a
> > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running.
> > If you need some debian-install
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Some packages are built quite regularly like bouml, which takes some days to
> > build. We maybe should postpone such sort of packages in order to build
> > packages that weren't built for a long time?
> Does there exist some
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a
> > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running.
> > If you need some debian-installer help, please let m
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a
> good time to get all your buildds fired up and running.
> If you need some debian-installer help, please let me know.
> Even with the fpu bugs, do ya'll think arany
We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a
good time to get all your buildds fired up and running.
If you need some debian-installer help, please let me know.
Even with the fpu bugs, do ya'll think aranym is ready to be a regular
buildd? In the coming months, I may be in a po
24 matches
Mail list logo
