> > > BTW java-gcj-compat has now a dependency on libgcj7-dev (>= 4.1.1-16)?
> > > This way it will never be built because gcj-4.1 4.1.1-16 waits for
> > > libxul0d (>= 1.8.0.7-1) and xulrunner waits for java-gcj-compat...
> >
> > Did anyone report a bug on this yet? How can we handle this manually
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > BTW java-gcj-compat has now a dependency on libgcj7-dev (>= 4.1.1-16)?
> > This way it will never be built because gcj-4.1 4.1.1-16 waits for
> > libxul0d (>= 1.8.0.7-1) and xulrunner waits for java-gcj-compat...
>
> Did anyone report a bug on
> BTW java-gcj-compat has now a dependency on libgcj7-dev (>= 4.1.1-16)?
> This way it will never be built because gcj-4.1 4.1.1-16 waits for
> libxul0d (>= 1.8.0.7-1) and xulrunner waits for java-gcj-compat...
Did anyone report a bug on this yet? How can we handle this manually? Can
I try buildin
> Michael, is mail working on vivaldi and spice for you now?
I've set up return address mapping now, but will need to bounce all the
stuff through my system again. Yikes.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:15:54PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > It seems as if someone did just that... ;)
> Not according to this:
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/architecture.php?a=m68k&buildd=buildd_m68k-arrakis
I just took a look at http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_stats.pn
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > BTW could someone please take care of the packages stuck on arrakis
> > (especially apache2)?
>
> It seems as if someone did just that... ;)
Not according to this:
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/architecture.php?a=m68k&buildd=bui
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:02:01PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> BTW could someone please take care of the packages stuck on arrakis
> (especially apache2)?
It seems as if someone did just that... ;)
Anyway, there are still 245 packages listed as building (that was 351 just
about an hour ago, th
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > java-gcj-compat just failed, although gcj-4.1 installs fine on my machine.
> > Could someone please check what's going on and perhaps build it manually.
> > xulrunner is waiting for it and way too much is waiting on this.
>
> Any special requir
> java-gcj-compat just failed, although gcj-4.1 installs fine on my machine.
> Could someone please check what's going on and perhaps build it manually.
> xulrunner is waiting for it and way too much is waiting on this.
Any special requirements for this (lots of RAM, fast machine)??
Micha
Hi,
java-gcj-compat just failed, although gcj-4.1 installs fine on my machine.
Could someone please check what's going on and perhaps build it manually.
xulrunner is waiting for it and way too much is waiting on this.
bye, Roman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
10 matches
Mail list logo
