Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:00:43AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:25:53AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > For the time being I am using 'sbuild -d stable' and I edit the .changes > > > file manually. > > > > Do you have a chroot-etch-m68k? Does it have deb-src list

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:25:53AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > For the time being I am using 'sbuild -d stable' and I edit the .changes > > file manually. > > Do you have a chroot-etch-m68k? Does it have deb-src listed for > etch-m68k? Also sbuild would need a minor patch to build etch-m6

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > regular dupload? You may need to target etch-m68k instead of etch, I > > guess. ISTR sbuild having an option for that (specifying the release to > > generate .chang

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > regular dupload? You may need to target etch-m68k instead of etch, I > guess. ISTR sbuild having an option for that (specifying the release to > generate .changes files for). 'sbuild -d etch-m68k' does not work. I added a priority

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:36:13PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > > > Between etch and etch-m68k: > > > > > > Between etch and securi

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-19 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > > Between etch and etch-m68k: > > > > Between etch and security.d.o: 40 source packages. > > > > By the way, if I build them, can I up

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Also, I/we've been asked to start building for oldstable ('oldstable' in > > > wanna-build

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:26:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > > > distcc+crosscc. Th

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Also, I/we've been asked to start building for oldstable ('oldstable' in > > wanna-build, as opposed to oldstable-security), since they apparently > > have the a

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > Between etch and etch-m68k: > > Between etch and security.d.o: 40 source packages. > > The list of package marked out-of-date: > > x11/

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:26:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > > distcc+crosscc. This will speed things quite a bit with no > > risk of breakage since we are

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:01:12PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > > distcc+crosscc. This will speed things quite a bit with no > > risk of breakage since we are

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > distcc+crosscc. This will speed things quite a bit with no > risk of breakage since we are using a stable cross-compiler > that is well tested. > > In my opinion, dis

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use > distcc+crosscc. This will speed things quite a bit with no > risk of breakage since we are using a stable cross-compiler > that is well tested. > In my opinion, distcc

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > My BoF about m68k here at DebConf went quite well; most of the release > team was present, as was James Troup for at least part of it. One thing > that came out of the discussion is that they really, really want 'faster > b

Re: [buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I had a short discussion with James Troup, and he told me he'd enable > Bill Allombert's emulated buildd machine. Now that it usefully runs > faster than crest, I think that's the best way to move forward, and I > had the feeling t

[buildd] Stuff

2007-06-18 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi, My BoF about m68k here at DebConf went quite well; most of the release team was present, as was James Troup for at least part of it. One thing that came out of the discussion is that they really, really want 'faster buildd machines'; apparently someone in the security team (I don't recall who