Hi Geert,
Anyway, the patch seems to be required for ramdisk use, so I better clean it
up one way or the other. Geert - do we need to be able to free allocated
ST-RAM? Otherwise, I'd just remove the dead freelist stuff and submit that.
Sorry, I'm a bit lost. Which patch(es) do you mean?
My p
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Slightly less hackish implementation of that hack attached. This (on top
> > > of my max_dma_address patch before) does solve the ramdisk related atafb
> > > problems without resorting to artificial RAM limits. Stephen, please try
> > > this patch.
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
