Re: [PATCH 04/18] test/input: Fix double-aligned test in dix_valuator_alloc() on m68k

2013-03-27 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> -#if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__sh__) >> +#if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__sh__) > > Any reason not to use __m68k__? That's what we tend to use in BSD land. __m68k__ is fine for me, too. Gr{oetje,eeting}

Re: [PATCH 04/18] test/input: Fix double-aligned test in dix_valuator_alloc() on m68k

2013-03-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:20:37 +0100 > > On m68k, doubles are not 64-bit aligned, just like on i386 and sh. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > test/input.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/input.c b/te

[PATCH 04/18] test/input: Fix double-aligned test in dix_valuator_alloc() on m68k

2013-03-27 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On m68k, doubles are not 64-bit aligned, just like on i386 and sh. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- test/input.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/input.c b/test/input.c index 90ab9ae..e2c8f4d 100644 --- a/test/input.c +++ b/test/input.c @@ -1354