Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-03-05 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:05:27PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: Hi, > If you like the idea or something similar, may I ask your help in > advocating its consideration on debian-devel and any other appropriate > place? I took quite some time to think about your proposal and related issues. As

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:26:39AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > I agree that something like this is necessary, on m68k most > if not all applications that use gmp, ssl and similar are in > desperate need to come in 68020-40 and 68060 flav

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-24 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:26:39AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:46PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > Greetings, and thanks for the insight. GCL does a subbuild of part of > > > GMP. With the default

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcc-3.2 problems in compiling GCL

2003-02-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:46PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings, and thanks for the insight. GCL does a subbuild of part of > > GMP. With the default configure script canonical host of > > m68k-unknown-linux-gnu, gmp3 adds -m