Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The final results are in:
>
> Summary table:
> Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
> ---++-++-++---++--
> armel || 3 |
week to confirm this.
I don't particularly feel like backporting those fixes to 2.6.17, especially
as the etch kernel target is 2.6.18, but others may volunteer to do it, or i
may do it if i find some time.
Friendlly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
; those new compilers?
Bastian blank added code to select the exact gcc version per arch. The idea
was not to build the kernel with 4.0 or 4.1, while the modules where built
with something else abi-incompatible.
So, if you really like, you can set the gcc thingy to gcc-2.95 or gcc-3.4 or
something,
produce the
compressed vmlinuz-* kernel, and dding it to a prep partition).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel in sarge is known to work, altough d-i has a few
glitches if i remember well, but i have seen Mark Ohlsen do a successful
install a couple of month ago.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
til
january.
There are no 2.4.27 generic powerpc kernels in etch/sid anymore, or there
should not be.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:16:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 08:44:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > The problem with miboot is that there are 200 or so m68k instructions
> > > > in the
> > > > boot sector, which
mber next time.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ss strong) issue is that you
need macos distribution from people.d.o, but I don't know of any such reason. I think
> miboot is not in non-free only because it's not useful to have it packaged
> there so long as there's no d-i-non-free package to make use of it.
Because of the a
is here now.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On F
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:27:52PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Actually, we could simply make a
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Actually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the
> > archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amiboot, which is
> > linke
ctually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the
archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amiboot, which is
linked to parts of amigaos, and thus non-free), and we do distribute those (or
at least used to distribute those in the woody times).
Friendly,
Sve
16 matches
Mail list logo
