On 12/22/07, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's indeed a bug the compiler would complain about if you had prototypes in a
> common header file.
Unfortunately, in this case there are different headers (with
different prototypes!)
--
Sergei Golovan
--
T
On 12/22/07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:34:08AM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> >
> > Is this a bug in ARAnyM or it is a difference between m68k and other
> > architectures?
>
> This is definately not a bug in ARAnyM.
>
ile on all other machines (non-m68k though) it gives
84
84
Is this a bug in ARAnyM or it is a difference between m68k and other
architectures?
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f("%g, %d\n", v, e);
}
and get the output
0.55, 1
0.05, -2147483647
which should be
0.55, 1
0.8, -3
(The result is incorrect iff the argument is less than 1 in absolute
value). Could it be a bug in Aranym? Where to report it better?
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
m68k and this operation took
722m1.09s (on hobbes) and 1167m38.02s (on vivaldi) respectively.
Could the inactivity time limits be increased for erlang on m68k and
new build scheduled?
Thanks!
--
Sergei Golovan
Please, CC me as I'm not subscribed to m68k lists
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
n GNU/Linux supported
architectures. I'm not using erlang on m68k architecture myself.
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing the above types differently than most published
application binary interface specifications for the m68k.
Can the issue with alignment of the structure be resolved using this
option? Or this option isn't recommended to use?
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on is the bug,
I cannot tell until someone sends me a pointer to the M68K Linux
(or SVR4) ABI document.
Then I would like to ask another question: Are there other variables
in erlang, which must be aligned to a 32-bit boundary? Or fixing
erts_bin_alloc_mtx alignment is sufficient?
--
Sergei
erl_init.c:211
#11 0x8002e568 in erl_start (argc=37, argv=0xe58c) at beam/erl_init.c:907
#12 0x8001a6fe in main (argc=37, argv=0xeffff584) at sys/unix/erl_main.c:28
-
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s this a bug in GCC that it doesn't align the
variable? Or is this a bug in erlang, and the fact that it works on
other architectures is a lucky coincidence?
Best wishes!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package is
sufficient to start build and it is available on m68k.
It would be nice if someone resolve this issue.
Best wishes!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/12/06, Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:38:09AM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> As far as I understand the problem is in one very long operation
> during which there isn't any output to stdout. So, I would like to ask
> if there a
ng which there isn't any output to stdout. So, I would like to ask
if there a way to increase this inactivity timeout? (For now the hand
made build of erlang for m68k is uploaded, but it's not a good idea to
build it separately after every new version come.)
Best wishes!
--
Sergei Golovan
13 matches
Mail list logo
