rs to come! Low power
consumption fanless with a SSD disk make superquiet and quite nice!
Riccardo
sion:
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/kernels/
downloaded the 3rd of may. It is the same version I used on the Q950.
The file seemed a new build, but still from the 2.6.29 series.
Is there another up-to date repository? Or were the patches backported
perhaps?
Thank you,
Riccar
telnet into the machine, it dies, the ethernet
driver gives up.
trigger_send() called with the transmitter busy.
I am pretty sure I had this problems months ago and thus gave
temporarily the IIfx up. But I couldn't find my old mail.
Riccardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@l
ng up the good work! My next tests will be
on the IIfx.
Apparently, the only two 68k I have left in active usage... are the two
most troublesome machines around!
RIccardo
zhen I try to
install it (not found) from the repositories I mentioned.
Thanks,
Riccardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hey,
nice you had your meeting. I tried all three days to log into
#debian-68k on freenode, but it was always empty.
good to here that there are good news...
Riccardo
On Wednesday, September 3, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Christian T. Steigies
wrote:
The meeting is over, the weather was even
interactive manner than Email.
It might even help debugging in some cases.
Riccardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I tried finn's 2.6 kernel and I see ther eis proble, on Q950 at least.
I hope that the scsi can be improved and that the IIfx will work soon.
One f the nasty little things that is missing is the RTC support: the
machiine boots always with "epoch". While the system time can be stet
later,
Hi,
On Friday, April 13, 2007, at 02:25 PM, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:25:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh. Guess we ought to make sure that buildd
hosts
which still run 2.2 are either replaced or upgraded now.
Are there any 2.2 hosts left
Hey,
On Tuesday, October 31, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
adacontrol No ada on m68k?
why shouldn't ?
cacao
I thought caco would run on 68k.
cynthiune.appWas Dep-Wait, for what?
well, it is an audio player. I don't know if any of the supported 6
boxes should try to run the whole
compiler toolchan equal up to minor releases, I had problems with that
even on x86 otherwise.
Have a nice day,
Riccardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On Monday, October 23, 2006, at 06:46 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I doubt it will change noticably for the non mainstream
architectures. Those that have their trusty old hardware running
Debian for years and years now aren't the people that reinstall their
system on every release.
Hello Roman,
On Wednesday, October 18, 2006, at 05:18 PM, Roman Zippel wrote:
This build attempt is from before gcj was fixed and once the buildd
gets
to it, it will build fine.
What's the point of this? arm fails to build this currently, do they
get
kicked out now because of this?
You di
slowing down the testing
cycle considerably.
Gcj could be attemtped too and afaik it has means in the classpath
build to split up the compiation and thus require less resources, I
have never tried it either but now that gcc 4.1 is working on 68k, I
suppose gcj is usable too?
Cheers,
2.x and 3.x
carried some breakage too. But that is off topic here.
Have a nice day,
Riccardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On Wednesday, October 18, 2006, at 03:43 AM, Roman Zippel wrote:
Outside of the m68k team I have unfortunately not seen any serious
effort
to actually accommodate the needs the smaller ports. Debian has been
the
home for a wide range of users, but that's unfortunately not true any
lon
Hello,
On Tuesday, October 17, 2006, at 03:54 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
An obvious alternative would be to set up a separate repository on
m68k.debian.net or something similar; but I'd prefer to exhaust other
possibilities before going down that route.
being still quite "shocked" about the
hese particular
architectures at all?
Cheers,
Riccardo
[*] these projects would be the kaffe Java VM, GNUstep and the related
Gnustep Application Project. Further I wrote PRICE, a gnustep image
filtering program, and pico server, a minimal webserver which suits 68k
pretty well. Neither pico ser
;generic media device support".
Fact is that Sonic is almost the only working thing on my quadra 840!
:-)
if there any reasonable news in the kernel from the 68k side (serial?
adb? news for q950 or IIfx?) I could attempt to compile a new kernel.
Cheers,
Riccardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello people,
does anybody have news about this? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've been subscribed there for years and it nostalgic now! It was
macspecific. Can this palce be a successor for those questions I asked
there?
-r
20 matches
Mail list logo
