On 6/5/2018 4:08 PM, Håkon Løvdal wrote:
> While the commit message contains the relevant information, this really
> ought to be present as a comment directly in the code as well. And
> the un-obviousness of the code vs check order deserves a mention as
> well, so please add a commen like
>
> +
The atari label gets false positives easily, so probe it after
all other labels have said no.
---
NEWS | 2 ++
libparted/libparted.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 2c903ca5..a5ec44ee 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -6,6 +6
On 6/5/2018 10:35 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Is that the reversed patch? I thought you wanted to move the atari
> probing to the bottom?
No; the order they are probed in is the reverse of the order they are
initialized in because the fs registration puts the new one on the head
and sli
On 5/12/2018 4:41 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I had that the wrong way - link order is not what matters here, the
> checks order has msdos before atari in fact.
Ok, I was going to say the dos table requires the 55AA signature that is
not expected to be found in an atari table.
One other thing I
On 5/11/2018 11:29 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Thanks for digging this up. I wasn't aware of this particular issue before
> and I agree, this needs to be addressed. I hope that I didn't cause too
> many DOS partitions to be misdetected. Sorry for the inconvenience if I
> did. The Atari p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 2:17 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I thought so too, but it turns out that the Atari IDE interface is
> literally wired “the wrong way”, so you do need to bswap the entire
> disc – not just partition table or filesystem metadata – but also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/16/2013 04:19 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>
>> But, of course, you could apply the patch to gparted, rebuild
>> it, then create a partition table on a hard disk and hook it up
>> to your ATARI and see if it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/16/2013 2:45 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that Philipp was talking about tests which are run
> during build time to check the code, hence the name "make check".
Yes. You should start with the current git head preferab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 6:32 PM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> John,
>
> as long as libparted (or some other PC side kernel magic
> automagically invoked by libparted - dm??) does take care of
> byte-swapping IDE data on the fly, go for it. I had a quick glance
> at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would you be able to write a test case so make check verifies it is
working?
On 12/13/2013 5:54 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While chatting with someone who was trying to install Linux onto
> his ATARI Falcon 060, we stumbled into t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/14/2013 02:26 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> The ST, maybe (except for the only-in-museums part), but the TT
> and Falcon run Debian GNU/Linux just finely.
>
> Linux ara5.mirbsd.org 3.11-2-m68k #1 Debian 3.11.7-1 (2013-11-09)
> m68k GNU/Linux
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/13/2013 05:54 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While chatting with someone who was trying to install Linux onto
> his ATARI Falcon 060, we stumbled into the task getting the hard
> disk partitioned for the ATARI Falcon to be used
12 matches
Mail list logo
