On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > I'm updating the syscall table for m68k...
>
> - add sys_setaltroot() (2.6.10-rc1)
According to akpm setaltroot is going away, so you will probably want to
drop this (the
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> We would just add it at the end? No compatibility problem. Syscall numbers are
> different on different architectures anyway.
>
Yes, that's true. Most platforms don't go out of their way to have
radically out-of-order syscall ta
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:50:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The syscall after sys_mq_getsetattr and before sys_waitid is reserved
> > for kexec, is there some reason that this isn't being filled as a
> > sys_ni_syscall for the time being instead?
>
> I dropped it because there's no imp
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> + .long sys_mq_notify /* 275 */
> + .long sys_mq_getsetattr
> + .long sys_waitid
> + .long sys_setaltroot
> + .long sys_add_key
> + .long sys_request_key /* 280 */
> + .long sys_keyctl
The sysca
4 matches
Mail list logo
