dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> There are a few m68k builds missing for releases DSAs:
>http://ftp-master.debian.org/oldstable-proposed-updates.html
>
> I signed the dhcp build log just a moment ago and it has been
> successfully uploaded. You can ignore it.
>
> openssl096 built at one point, b
php4_4:4.3.10-21 failed to build on kullervo with
"sbuild received SIGTERM -- shutting down"
Please investigate/fix.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oldstable-security builds fail on kullervo:
Automatic build of clamav_0.84-2.sarge.16 on kullervo by sbuild/m68k 85
Build started at 20070423-1758
**
Checking available source versions...
Checking available source versions
Again for a lack of disk space, this time on q650. Please fix.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:52:07AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > The build on hobbes failed, the build log just ends w/o apparent reason.
>
> The apparent reason was hobbes froze hard at that time (no response to
> ping, even). I've disabled security for now; please requeue (or yell) to
> have
FYI:
The build on hobbes failed, the build log just ends w/o apparent reason.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > FYI. I have no idea, why this was rejected?
>
> Neither have I. Maybe ftp-master checks uploads against a list of machines
> permitted to upload to stable-security ?? I'd have to repeat the upload
> from another machine in that case.
Please reschedule on the regular sta
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I'll need a python expert here. Please get the python maintainer to debug
> this.
Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI. I have no idea, why this was rejected?
Cheers,
Moritz
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge2_m68k.changes REJECTED
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:50:01 +0200
Rejected: xfr
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > The build for python2.4 failed twice. I suppose it's a problem on the
> > > buildd. Please fix ASAP.
> >
> > Oh, sorry, you are talking about the security build, I only looked at the
> > build for unstable...
>
> Which machine
The build for python2.4 failed twice. I suppose it's a problem on the buildd.
Please fix ASAP.
Cheers,
Moritz
ar cr libpython2.4.a Modules/getbuildinfo.o
ar cr libpython2.4.a Parser/acceler.o Parser/grammar1.o Parser/listnode.o
Parser/node.o Parser/parser.o Parser/parsetok.o
+Parser/bi
Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> It's not the ftpmaster stuff that needs to be done, it's the RM and
>> security stuff. Security stuff for *sarge* is already a problem, with
>> the xfree86 update currently blocking the release of r4, due to lack of
>> an m68k build, eg.
Build times for kdebase_4:3.3.2-1s
Please fix.
Moritz
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Log for given-back build of clamav_0.84-2.sarge.11
(dist=stable-security)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:50:50 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automatic build of clamav_0.84-2.sarge.11 on zeus by sbuild/m68
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:54:48PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > the xfree86 stable-security build failed after 26 hours due to a lack of
> > free disk space (as opposed to firefox, where the build wasn't even started
> > at all in the dpkg-source stage. Please free more diskspace and restart
>
Hi,
the xfree86 stable-security build failed after 26 hours due to a lack of
free disk space (as opposed to firefox, where the build wasn't even started
at all in the dpkg-source stage. Please free more diskspace and restart
ASAP, if it's delaying things for too long I'll release without m68k.
Che
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> My spare time is too limited to care about m68k. I'd suggest you prepare
>> the m68k binary updates from the regular source updates available on
>> s.d.o on your own.
>
> Could m68k still do security building out of wanna-build?
Of course, you could also have continued
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> August 16 birthday party in Breda, I discussed this with Jeroen Van
> Wolffelaar who told me that in theory, it should not be very hard to
> create a suite in dak to allow us to have a mostly-etch distribution;
> one that is only slightly different from the 'real' etch. Giv
17 matches
Mail list logo
