Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-10-01 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz >> wrote: >> [...] >> > On the other hand, some packages dropped support for Pow

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-09-30 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Adrian, On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] > On the other hand, some packages dropped support for PowerPC32 like Mono > but this isn't a concern for most users, I would say. [...] Thanks very much for stepping up as porter, you have my vote ! However I need

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-09-30 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi all, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >>>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker) >> >> I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already >> maintaining

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi Hector, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Hector Oron wrote: [...] > While working out ArchitectureQualification/Stretch wiki page I > believe everything is mostly fine for release, however I got a > personal concern on powerpc architecture. Is it well maintained? Does > it have porters? Does i

openexr

2016-04-22 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
[CC me please] I am trying to debug openexr FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openexr&arch=m68k&ver=2.2.0-10&stamp=1460951911 As far as I know there are no porterbox for m68k: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi Anyone could try to dump a full backtrace of the crash ? thank

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of >> GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and >> powerpc. > > Could you include armhf in the list as w