Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so
that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a
mail to that list asking for help.
Kurt
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success
> > > on architectures not tested by upstream.
> >
> > And have Format->Character in Impress crash w
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote:
>On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3
>>> and
>>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about
>>> how he
>>> regretted the m
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote:
> * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change
>also apply to this port? [0]
If -fPIE is the default will -fPIC override it?
It will also default to tell the linker to use -pie, but then
don't do
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable
> > (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We
> > need to run sparc with olds
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'll make GCC 4.6 the
> > default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at
> > least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc.
>
> If you do the switch
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> > on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
> > summarized in http:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:48:32PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > As a result, the bts is already ignoring m68k in calculating a bug's
> > applicability for the testing distribution, at the release team's request.
>
> As someone who has recently looked at and fixed many problems, I must say
> the
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> This was resolved, only to hit the next problem with amd64: The amd64
> archive signing key is not trusted by apt. So currently testing amd64
> installs only work from the netinst CD, all the other install methods,
> which use apt auth
9 matches
Mail list logo
