Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:31:53 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser
wrote:
> using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
>
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=x264
>
> [...]
>
> So this means that because someone added the build profiles thing,
> wanna-bui
Hi,
Quoting Dmitrijs Ledkovs (2013-11-28 01:15:06)
> On 28 November 2013 00:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > I also find it interesting to see openjdk-7 listed but not gcj; or even
> > gcc-4.8. Was this computed for jessie or sid?
>
> I guess implicit relationships are not considered: build-e
Hi,
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2013-11-28 01:04:56)
> On 27/11/13 17:58, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > http://mister-muffin.de/p/Gid8.txt
> >
> > One can see that now the amount of source packages which is needed to build
> > the
> > rest of the archive is
Hi,
Quoting peter green (2013-11-28 01:12:57)
> One problem with these metrics is that you get source packages whose
> importance is artifically inflated because of the way our source packages
> work. If anything in a source package needs x then the whole source package
> has to build-depend on x.
Hi,
the following is a report of a successful implementation of what I have been
talking about with Niels Thykier during debconf13. The question was how
important it is for a source package to be compilable or exist in the first
place given an incomplete port which is in the process of being boots
Hi Peter,
Quoting peter green (2013-10-27 01:11:24)
> Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Until these two issues are fixed we will not be able to get an algorithmic
> > answer to the question of what constitutes the minimum required set of
> > packages.
> >
> There is a
Hi,
(I was not able to find the debian-ports list on lists.debian.org (so I
subscribed via email) did I just miss it?)
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2013-10-23 22:04:59)
> I had a play with the 'botch' tool (see description[1]) for determining build
> order when bootstrapping an architecture.
botc
7 matches
Mail list logo
