On 15413 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thats ok, end of May is a nice point to take.
Thanks for the work and the timeframe for the rest!
kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that all the 3 architectures
have now
On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
is on the table already, it doesn't make much difference if its 2 or 8.
Just something thats clear defined and
On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
The process to inject all packages to debian-ports is to get all the
deb, udeb and buildinfo files from the archives (main and debug
Hey,
as I was unable to find any etch-m68k uploads done after June 2008, I
just disabled that suite on ftp.debian.org. The suite will stay around
on ftp-master and the mirrors as long as regular etch does, and will be
archived together with it on archive.debian.org, but no changes
(uploads) are al
Hi
And yet another try:
To: bui...@hobbes.waratah.dyndns.org
Subject: Processing of cunit_2.1-0.dfsg-9_m68k.changes
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:37:05 +
cunit_2.1-0.dfsg-9_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libcunit1-dev_2.1-0.dfsg-9_m68k.deb
libcunit1_2.1
Hi
the buildd behind hobbes.waratah.dyndns.org is *STILL* trying to upload
to ftp-master.debian.org.
Of course it all gets rejected so you waste time trying to do it.
Additionally, it has a broken mail setup:
bui...@hobbes.waratah.dyndns.org
Unrouteable address
Please fix.
--
bye, Joerg
Hi
as already written long ago, m68k was scheduled to get removed from
ftpmaster, at least for the time being.
It got setup on debian-ports.org some weeks ago and is alive
there with all builds getting uploaded there instead of
ftpmaster. Finally, today we removed the remaining m68k files for
uns
Hi,
with the Lenny release upcoming we are thinking about larger changes to
the Debian archive, of which one point is "Clean up the supported
architecture list to free up space for new ones".
We had a few discussions during DebConf8 and came up with the following
rules:
- If an architecture fa
8 matches
Mail list logo
