Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k]

2006-12-14 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:29:29PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:25:36AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > Please remove the following m68k binary p

Re: Bug#398879: Change in package architectures list.

2006-12-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
m68k and arm builds, m68k & arm buildd maintainers can of course always reintroduce this package on their archs by simply having their buildds succesfully build it. Actually, it seems that the m68k build is already gone. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k]

2006-10-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
elf-test that will fail because m68k is unsupported, or if that isn't doable, just exit 1'ing when you're building on m68k. Once the package is outdated on m68k, I can remove it. As it is now, it'd return in the same version, causing all kinds of awkwardies. --Jeroen -- Jeroen

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing]

2005-04-16 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
If anyone would like to comment, please do so to the bug. Note that I'm not subscribed to either of these two lists. Thanks, --Jeroen - Forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:10:02 -0500 To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL