Re: emulation has fewer bugs than certain hardware

> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:21:33PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > I recall reading a better quote about hardware having more problems. > > Things like bad disks, overheating CPU's, questionable drivers for > > certain hardware? Certainly there's a

emulation has fewer bugs than certain hardware

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:57:07PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to > > > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd po

testing_outdate, build clustalw, buildd information request...

Hi, http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_outdate.txt has bothered me since I discovered it a few times. It shows m68k has 22 out of date with mipsel and hppa at 6. Most are at 0 or 1. Please consider building/uploading clustalw 1.83-1.2 What's going on with etch-secure? See http://etch-se

Please build tpu vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4

Hi, Please build vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4 that was uploaded via testing-proposed-updates (tpu). I don't see where information about who's building tpu. This one package should fix a few of the uninstallable packages listed at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html I plan to

ICE "likely" hardware prob when diff result after repeate (was: [buildd] failed packages)

On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:17:04 +0100, "Christian T. Steigies" wrote: > I looked through the failed packages yesterday and found some that > had strange gcc failures, how does gcc know a bug is not reproducible? > > http://www.buildd.net/cgi/package_status?unstable_pkg=texmaker&searchtype=m68k&arch=

bts, t-p-u buildd, "testing problems", glibc 2.4...

Hi, I did a quick look at a few packages on . I need a better understanding of t-p-u buildd's, and where to collect information. The m68k rc user tagged bugs in the bts are out of date (most can probably be closed). ejabberd requires erlang

libbonoboui, testing packages install...

I haven't been able to look at the m68k-build list archives as they seem to be broken. These questions may already be explained. In about 10 days (when openldap2 goes into testing) there will likely be people complaining that libbonoboui won't compile on the m68k arch [1] and is thus holding back

68k or m68k port status

What's happening with the m68k port? - debian-68k [1] has two posts so far this month. - debian-devel-m68k-changes [2] doesn't seem to have had any posts since March 18th this year (no new m68k packages?). - debian-m68k-changes [3] just seems to collect spam. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [4] doesn't seem