On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > These are the list of ports that I see:
>
> I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead
> harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldsta
d therefore
don't need a tag.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> In any event, if a few active porters wouldn't mind creating a wishlist
> bug against bugs.debian.org for this with a suggested course of action,
> I'd appreciate it. Assuming there is no significant disagreement about
> that cour
iate it. Assuming there is no significant disagreement about
that course of action, I'd like to implement it within a week or so.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
PowerPoint is symptomatic of a certain type of bureaucratic
environment: one typified by intermin
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
> > them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
> > package FTBFS on 4 architectures,
hich solution
porters would prefer.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
"For those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
For those who do not, none is possible."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
6 matches
Mail list logo
