Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
y > issue that may be exploitable, even on non-m68k. If you think this is a security issue, please talk to upstream and/or security@ to get a CVE assigned, so this is fixed not just in Debian. -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `-

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
(Removed bug from CC, this is not about the bug anymore.) * John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [160328 10:45]: > On 03/28/2016 01:18 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> The PTS says "LowNMU" for ruby2.3 which clearly means "Do an NMU without > >> asking if you want

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-27 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
to look up the exact policy the maintainer has expressed on the wiki page you've linked to. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `-

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-27 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
ing the updated and cleaned up patch in any case. Thanks. -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `-