On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> during the weekend I built eglibc manually without disabling
> the tests and here’s the result for your perusal.
>
> Cc’ing the porters list in case there’s someone who can do
> something about those failures ;)
Get involv
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:02 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
>
> On 18-Jun-13, at 6:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> This is true that they have recently contacted me through another email
>> address, but I haven't found time to work on that. Just stay tuned.
>
>
> That's great news
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
> next
> two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the
> default
> compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many
On 7/14/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i) that hppa (in the way configure sees it) is not supported:
checking if .size is needed... yes
checking if .align directive takes logarithmic value... no
configure: error: No atomic primitives available for hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
make:
>
> The arm bug isn't fixed in CVS - It's a toolchain problem that I'll work
> around with a local hack to disable combreloc. HPPA hasn't submitted
> yet. Last I heard ia64's patch wasn't in CVS yet, and I have no idea
> what's up with Sparc. So it doesn't seem like post of the arch bugs are
>
Branden,
> The long story, for those interested:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2002/debian-x-200208/msg00091.html
> (and read the whole thread)
> The short story:
> I need people with root on machines of your given architecture to
> compile and run the attached C program. It consists of cod
6 matches
Mail list logo
