On Sun, Oct 27, 2024, at 06:16, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
>> Finn Thain dixit:
>>
>> >That would mean __alignof__(foo.b) == sizeof(foo.b) but that's not the
>> >case on my Linux/i686 system. 4 != 8:
>> >
>> >struct baa {
>> >int a;
>> >long l
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024, at 22:24, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Okt 25 2024, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
>> Question is, do we need a kernel change for this at all?
>> Is there anything in the kernel/userland interface that
>> gets affected by this, or do these APIs use sufficient
>> explicit padding? Has
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024, at 10:10, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 09:55 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I think the idea of using the generic syscall ABI (in particular
>> the time64-only variant) makes sense if there is going to be a
>> new ABI, and
n the Debian or Gentoo Wiki to
> draft a design
> for switching over. Geert also mentioned that we should use this
> transition to clean
> up the kernel ABI by removing old syscalls and switch the kernel to
> asm-generic which
> is why I have included Arnd Bergmann in the CC
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 16:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> I think the hard part here is knowing who to send the patches to.
>> Unmaintained file systems are particularly tricky, in this case I
>> would have used
>>
>> To: Alexander Viro
>> To: Jan Kara
>&g
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 12:06, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201120140633.1673-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/
> [PATCH] isofs: fix Oops with zisofs and large PAGE_SIZE
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/2020
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 10:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 16:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>>
>> Currently it's still "int iso_date()" in:
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/isofs/isofs.h line 109
>> https://gith
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 16:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> likely to still be in routine use beyond 2038
>
> Sidenote towards ISO 9660 image producers:
>
> Don't forget to check from time to time whether Linux removed the
> int bottleneck in fs/isofs/.
> See:
> https
8 matches
Mail list logo
