Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task

2019-09-30 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc Ian> development task"): >> given the reminders that Debian refrains from paying developers >> for their time, I wonder if it would still be possible to make a >> small cont

Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task

2019-09-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task"): > given the reminders that Debian refrains from paying developers for > their time, I wonder if it would still be possible to make a small > contribution that expresses Debian's interest and sympathy to your goal,

Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task

2019-09-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task"): > To be clear, I think the work that folks are doing on the unofficial > Debian ports is valuable and important and that the m68k GCC task is a > good idea. I only dislike using Debian funds to pay people for their > tim

Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task

2019-09-30 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, On 30.09.19 06:20, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 11:44:26AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : In the future, gcc upstream expects all backends to be using MODE_CC for the internal register representation as the old CC0 is supposed to be removed. Since the lack o