Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

2018-12-11 Thread Adam Borowski
[Oy vey, crosspost list from hell -- not sure how to trim...] On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote: > I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures > should have better, more robust support from the Debian project. > For example, arch-specific p

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

2018-12-11 Thread Gregor Riepl
Hi Adrian I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures should have better, more robust support from the Debian project. For example, arch-specific packages most decidedly have a place in Debian (although they should not be the norm). There will always be such packages

Appuntamento con il nuovo ciclo di lectiones magistrales di AFIP International

2018-12-11 Thread Sprea Editori
Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio, clicca qui: http://www.mailant.it/nl.aspx?idp=14715&idn=101034&cvp=0E2FA94E582CE1334891A9A307CD9E07B21F6098&idu=6421456&cvup=B35D0F1C17E702720DDFA13B79C79F533ED647AF

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

2018-12-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello! On 12/9/18 3:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > To me it looks sometimes that Debian is used for testing by upstream, and for > that the mips architectures don't need to be release architectures. A note on this: If you decide to move MIPS to Debian Ports, you will make the port unusable to mos