Re: BTS usertags: user debian-68k@l.d.o or debian-m68k@l.d.o for m68k?

2017-12-19 Thread Michael Schmitz
Am 20.12.2017 um 00:40 schrieb Christian T. Steigies: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:57:16AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> >> Yes, please. I assume that m68k-bu...@nocrew.org is the historic >> mailing list for Debian's m68k porters. Christian will most >> likely know this. > > IIRC, ma

Re: BTS usertags: user debian-68k@l.d.o or debian-m68k@l.d.o for m68k?

2017-12-19 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > Also, @Aaron: Thanks for filing these bug reports. But may I ask you to > always to include X-Debbugs-CC with the appropriate porters mailing > list? Then the people who are primarily interested in fixing the bugs > (the porters) will get notified as well. Goo

Re: BTS usertags: user debian-68k@l.d.o or debian-m68k@l.d.o for m68k?

2017-12-19 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:57:16AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Yes, please. I assume that m68k-bu...@nocrew.org is the historic > mailing list for Debian's m68k porters. Christian will most > likely know this. IIRC, mailing lists where not even invented when I joined m68k... We co

Re: BTS usertags: user debian-68k@l.d.o or debian-m68k@l.d.o for m68k?

2017-12-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Pabs! On 12/19/2017 07:02 AM, Paul Wise wrote: I was doing some cleanup on Debian usertags and I noticed that some 8 bugs were associated with the non-existent debian-m68k mailing list while 53 other m68k related bugs were instead associated with the debian-68k mailing list. I then moved the