Re: Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 05/11/2017 08:27 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > That's promising, but it doesn't eliminate glibc as a potential problem. > Do we have glibc test suite results? Well, it's potentially a glibc problem. But I haven't fully ruled out other packages yet. All I know is that it works with an older chroot whi

Re: Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread Finn Thain
On Thu, 11 May 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 05/11/2017 04:46 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > > Or maybe a race condition in the kernel or glibc futex implementation? > > On qemu-m68k, the kernel isn't even running. That's promising, but it doesn't eliminate glibc as a potential problem.

Re: Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 05/11/2017 04:46 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > Or maybe a race condition in the kernel or glibc futex implementation? On qemu-m68k, the kernel isn't even running. And on Aranym, I'm running the same kernel on which it works with an older chroot. And, as I said, when I replace the libjvm.so itself, it

Re: Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread Finn Thain
On Wed, 10 May 2017, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 05/10/2017 11:21 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Does diffing the disassembly of (parts of) that give any meaningful > > information? Maybe rather the individual .a files in libjvm.a? > > Hmm, that could be an idea. However, I don't hav

Re: Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 05/10/2017 11:21 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Does diffing the disassembly of (parts of) that give any meaningful > information? Maybe rather the individual .a files in libjvm.a? Hmm, that could be an idea. However, I don't have a static library at the moment, just the dynamic one. Here's a ta

Re: Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: >actually re-packed by me by replacing libjvm.so from Andreas Schwab's build Ouch. Does diffing the disassembly of (parts of) that give any meaningful information? Maybe rather the individual .a files in libjvm.a? As for the main problem, no idea. I don’t even k

Testers with real m68k hardware needed

2017-05-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! liburcu is currently missing support m68k. The maintainer of the Debian package has kindly written a patch which adds m68k support to the library [1]. However, he was told by upstream that the patch should be tested on real hardware. So, for anyone currently running Debian/m68k, your help is

Futex problems with firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 on m68k

2017-05-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! We're having an odd issue on Debian/m68k with both firebird3.0 and openjdk-8 hanging during build until the build process is killed. With openjdk-8, it looks like this [1]: checking if we are using ecj as javac... [debian/buildwatch.sh] compiler/java/jar running ... [debian/buildwatch.sh] c