Caso de Exito - Alquiler de Grúas Odebrecht

2016-03-28 Thread Gerencia - Transporte Progaven
estimados srs. subscriber queremos presentarle nuestra organización y tener la posibilidad de convertirnos en proveedores de logística de su empresa. durante los ultimos 3 años hemos trabajado de la con la constructora norberto odebrecht y queriamos presentarles algunas de las imagenes y los c

Re: Debian on mac68k

2016-03-28 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, I wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Mac User wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This kernel boots on my LC III, but not on my IIfx (it hangs right > > before the boot screen comes up, at the same point where there is > > about a 2-minute pause when booting Debian 3.1). > > Thank

Re: Debian on mac68k

2016-03-28 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Mac User wrote: > Hello, > > This kernel boots on my LC III, but not on my IIfx (it hangs right > before the boot screen comes up, at the same point where there is about > a 2-minute pause when booting Debian 3.1). Thanks for testing. What happens if you boot MacOS with ext

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Geert Uytterhoeven [160328 10:33]: > > I really don't want to add another patch except for critical issues > > (and that are likely to be applied to 2.3) at this point - so ... No. > > "tail call overwriting the (non-existing) argument" sounds like a security > issue that may be exploitable, ev

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
(Removed bug from CC, this is not about the bug anymore.) * John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [160328 10:45]: > On 03/28/2016 01:18 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> The PTS says "LowNMU" for ruby2.3 which clearly means "Do an NMU without > >> asking if you want to fix something" [1]. If that's not

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > "tail call overwriting the (non-existing) argument" sounds like a security > issue that may be exploitable, even on non-m68k. It's only a problem if the argument is passed on the stack. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 5

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 03/28/2016 01:18 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> The PTS says "LowNMU" for ruby2.3 which clearly means "Do an NMU without >> asking if you want to fix something" [1]. If that's not what you want, >> don't use that tag. > > You're mistaken. The "tag" is per-maintainer, and you need to look

Re: Bug#816077: ruby2.3: FTBFS on m68k - Segmentation fault at 0x5f583332

2016-03-28 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [160327 23:00]: >> Here's an updated patch which contains the actual changes that upstream >> committed to the git repository to close the upstream bug 12118 [1]. >> >> Would be possible to cherry-pick th