Re[2]: Debian on mac68k

2016-02-25 Thread Finn Thain
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Scott Holder wrote: > > > > > > > > > https://www.telegraphics.com.au/~fthain/stan/linux-m68k-image-4.1.18-mac-00084-ge6b89b9.tar.gz > > > > SHA1 9ee49c4d9361785b872f9448acd3e25a4f52ab92 > > > >The patches are the 84 that I've sent to the scsi maintainers. They > >affe

Re: Debian on mac68k

2016-02-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 02/25/2016 06:55 PM, Scott Holder wrote: > Gave this a shot on the ol' LC 475 and it booted up fine. Maybe a little > bit faster than the previous 3.x I was using. Gave it a good > dist-upgrade and it seems to be running well, aside from a couple weird > SCSI messages. Probably hardware. Great

Re[2]: Debian on mac68k

2016-02-25 Thread Scott Holder
-- Original Message -- From: "Finn Thain" To: "Mac User" Cc: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" ; debian-68k@lists.debian.org Sent: 2/23/2016 11:27:45 PM Subject: Re: Debian on mac68k https://www.telegraphics.com.au/~fthain/stan/linux-m68k-image-4.1.18-mac-00084-ge6b89b9.tar.gz SH

Making Debian ports less burdensome

2016-02-25 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi. Packages are auto-removed from testing when they are RC-buggy. Could we do something similar in unstable, for Debian's ports? A FTBFS on any *one* release arch, delays testing migration on all arches. It makes the package RC-buggy, which could trigger its autoremoval from testing if not hand

Bug#815895: gcc-5: FTBFS on m68k: Typo in debian/rules.d/binary-gcc.mk

2016-02-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: gcc-5 Version: gcc-5: FTBFS on m68k - typo in debian/rules.d/binary-gcc.mk Severity: normal User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org Usertags: m68k Hi! Revision 8686 [1] of the gcc-5 packaging introduced a regression due to a typo: cp -p $(srcdir)/gcc/config/m69k/m68k-{devices,microarc