Re: ruby2.2 fuckup

2015-11-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: >You *do* need X11 for the initial setup as Aranyms fbcon driver is >read-only and doesn't allow any keyboard input. This has been much of >a show stopper really. No, just a disc image with ssh set up. >I have had arguments with my boss over this more than once a

Re: ruby2.2 fuckup

2015-11-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 12:38 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: > > Ah, it’s not that much. And you can probably put the few things that > do need to be done on top of your FAI stuff. > > OK @ the rest, but I could not let the first comment (X11) stand. You *do* n

Re: ruby2.2 fuckup

2015-11-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit: >For Aranym, I first need to run a X server to set up the system. You >cannot configure Aranym headless. Nonsense. I did so on the Xen domU in which the ARAnyM VM ara5 runs. >Secondly, you need a manual, more complicated network configuration as … well yes… >To

Re: ruby2.2 fuckup (was Re: Log for attempted build of libselinux_2.4-3 on m68k (dist=unstable))

2015-11-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Eero Tamminen wrote: >> Not really possible to keep the Aranyms. They take up space in my >> office which I and especially my boss want to get rid of. The qemu-m68k >> stuff can be easily set up on our VMWare cluster. > > Why Aranym emulator takes office space an

Re: ruby2.2 fuckup (was Re: Log for attempted build of libselinux_2.4-3 on m68k (dist=unstable))

2015-11-24 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, On 11/21/2015 01:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 11/21/2015 12:08 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: You should keep some Aranyms and real hardwares: qemu-m68k is not perfect. Not really possible to keep the Aranyms. They take up space in my office which I and especially my boss want to