Bas Wijnen dixit:
>The assertion that fails is an alignment check, which means that forcing
>the alignment the way you do should must have been ineffective. Any
No idea, C++ is out of my depth.
I know that GCC will need the alignment attribute twice in structs, e.g.
struct foo {
int ba
Hello Thorsten and other m68k porters,
Sorry for not replying to this for so long. Thank you for reporting the
issue. I am not sure how to solve it, however. Your patch looks like
it should work.
The assertion that fails is an alignment check, which means that forcing
the alignment the way you
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>> m68k computers like Amigas and Ataris have an incredibly large fanbase
>
> m68k was never as "incredibly" popular as (for example) x86. But all
> architectures ultimately die in a commercial sense. If F/OSS process can't
> accomodate a legacy m
Matthias Klose dixit:
>0.18 is documented as minimum version for GCC 4.8. I'll leave it this way.
Oh, okay.
>Please consider backporting isl and cloog-isl.
Mh, or ditching wheezy… we’ll see.
>all other patches now checked in.
OK, thanks a lot!
bye,
//mirabilos
--
„Also irgendwie hast du IMM
Am 17.11.2013 01:05, schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> + * rules.conf: Do not force libcloog-isl-dev (>= 0.18) on older
> +distribution releases that do not have this version yet.
>
> ISTR writing about this already: as I regularily build cross
> compilers for wheezy/amd64 which doesn’t have this ve
5 matches
Mail list logo
