Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Scott Holder
On 11/19/2013 5:53 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Scott Holder wrote: This booted great for me. It might just be placebo effect but I feel like it booted a fair bit faster than the last one. Modules seem great too. This actually let me get about half a second of working mouse in X b

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: > Unfortunately this didn't work for me (via Penguin, 32bit mode, new > filesystem), but I'm not clear on what what failed. > > The error screen: http://imgur.com/v4uS3ia > > Salient bit: > Data read fault at 0x in Super Data (pc:0x3e22c) >

Re: Buying RAM expansion from project money

2013-11-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 11/05/2013 11:27 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 11/05/2013 09:02 AM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: >> Am 05.11.2013 um 08:34 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven : >> Let's give this a try. >>> Indeed! >> >> So I would say, that - if noone objects until Thursday 0:00 GMT - we ask for >> a quote

FPU emulation: Unimplemented instruction

2013-11-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi there! Continuing the recent discussion of FPU emulation in the kernel, I stumbled across my first problem with it yesterday. However, it's not actually a reliability issue but simply particular instruction not supported by the emulation code. The error message about the unimplemented instruct

Re: gcc-4.8: [m68k] patch set 2013-11

2013-11-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >The .debdiff is attached, for your convenience to read through and >comment on it already. I’m currently building this, and I’ll report >success (or not) in about a week (since it takes at least five days >for this to compile, from experience). Okay, I built and tested this, and it in

Re: Bug#728392: linux: Please update m68k config

2013-11-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Ben, thanks for all, I’ve built and uploaded 3.12-1~exp1 and it boots just fine (on my VM; those with real hardware will have to send in their own feedback). @those people: http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/linux will have the m68k links… shortly. root@ara3:~ # cat /proc/version

Re: gcc-4.8 (4.8.2-5+m68k.1) feedback

2013-11-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod >Looking at smokeqt/python-qt4 now (the relocation thing). [ 38%] Building CXX object qtgui/CMakeFiles/smokeqtgui.dir/x_20.cpp.o cd /tmp/buildd/smokeqt-4.11.3/obj-m68k-linux-gnu/qtgui && /usr/bin/c++ -DSMOKE_BUILDING -Dsmokeqtgui_EXPORTS -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-s

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Patrick McCarthy
On 11/18/2013 2:40 AM, Finn Thain wrote: On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Patrick McCarthy wrote: The ARAnyM kernel and initrd you posted unfortunately didn't work, I put them in Penguin in 32bit mode and it hung at 'MacLinux ABCDEFGHIJK'. I've built a Mac-only 3.12 kernel that you or Scott may want to

gcc-4.8 (4.8.2-5+m68k.1) feedback

2013-11-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
| pnt.c:176:1: internal compiler error: in subreg_get_info, at rtlanal.c:3387 This one (r-base FTBFS) is already fixed, thanks! Looking at smokeqt/python-qt4 now (the relocation thing). bye, //mirabilos -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"... -

Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Might be worth leaving one platform out of the multiplatform set at a > time to see whether that rogue driver is from Amiga, Atari or what else. The problem is, I didn't use debian sources and toolchain to build a working kernel. So the first st

Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > ... Multiplatform interrupt support might be another one. Yes. My hunch is that this issue is interrupt related. Were there interrupt changes on the atari side between mainline 3.10 and 3.12 (?) Finn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-re

Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III

2013-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Scott Holder wrote: > This booted great for me. It might just be placebo effect but I feel > like it booted a fair bit faster than the last one. Modules seem great > too. This actually let me get about half a second of working mouse in X > before it froze up or something.

Re: Mac-only binary

2013-11-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >> booted a fair bit faster than the last one. Modules seem great too. This > >Single-platform kernels are usually faster. Well of course, but then, you have less drivers and probes and all that. But on the other hand… who cares about boot speed? Run speed is the one. Ov