Josef Bacik dixit:
>So stripe_len shouldn't be 0, if it is you have bigger problems :).
☺
>Is this a corrupt fs or something? If there was some sort of
I don’t think so, I can access and use that filesystem under 3.2
just fine (it’s what I created it under, too, so it’s possible
that it’s indee
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 16:40 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> So stripe_len shouldn't be 0, if it is you have bigger problems :). Is this a
> corrupt fs or something? If there was some sort of corruption that occured
> then
> I suppose stripe_len could be 0 and we'd need to catch that somewhere higher
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:02:29PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josef Bacik dixit:
>
> >Can you gdb btrfs.ko and do
> >
> >list *(__btrfs_map_block+0x11c)
>
> Not easily (the kernel image is from a .deb package),
> and even in a compile tree gdb just says:
> No symbol table is loaded. Use the
Josef Bacik dixit:
>Can you gdb btrfs.ko and do
>
>list *(__btrfs_map_block+0x11c)
Not easily (the kernel image is from a .deb package),
and even in a compile tree gdb just says:
No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.
With a bit of cheating and a cross-compiler, this is:
(gdb) list
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 13:13 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I've looked at all the places we do divides in this function and it
> doesn't look like we're doing this anywhere but I could be blind,
do_div seems a likely suspect...
/*
* stripe_nr counts the total number of stripes we ha
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > NEW problem: btrfs doesn’t work at all. I had to reboot my
> > buildd into 3.2 using echo s/u/s/o >/proc/sysrq-trigger as
> > the attempt to mount it left the system hanging there.
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>404
Sorry, bit slow ;-)
http://www.freewrt.org/~tg/dp/dists/hacks/clean/Notyet/linux-image-3.10-1-m68k_3.10.3-1_m68k.deb
bye,
//mirabilos
--
17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so
17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig
17:10
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
> 0: 222e ff74 movel %fp@(-140),%d1
> 4: 2a2e ff5c movel %fp@(-164),%d5
> 8: 2c2e ff60 movel %fp@(-160),%d6
> c: 4c45 1402 < divul %d5,%d2,%d1 >
> 10: 2d40 ff64 movel %d0,%fp@(-156)
> 14: 2d41 ff68 movel %d1,%fp@(-152)
>
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> NEW problem: btrfs doesn’t work at all. I had to reboot my
> buildd into 3.2 using echo s/u/s/o >/proc/sysrq-trigger as
> the attempt to mount it left the system hanging there.
> [0.00] Linux version 3.10-1-m68k (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org)
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I’d like the m68k people to read the whole eMail and test
> https://www.freewrt.org/~tg/dp/dists/hacks/dirty/Crossbuilt/linux/linux-image-3.10-0+m68k.1-m68k_3.10.1-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb
404
> on all their boxen, at least Amiga/Atari/Macintosh
Hi everyone,
I dist-upgraded all of my VMs to latest unstable.
The Linux 3.10 kernel still has all these initcall warnings
I already wrote about (but is still usable).
NEW problem: btrfs doesn’t work at all. I had to reboot my
buildd into 3.2 using echo s/u/s/o >/proc/sysrq-trigger as
the attemp
11 matches
Mail list logo
