On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:21:50PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ben Hutchings dixit:
>
> >As m68k is not a release architecture, I don't care much what goes
> >in debian/config/m68k (well, it had better not break gencontrol.py).
> >Whatever the m68k porters come up with is fine.
>
> OK, thanks
Ben Hutchings dixit:
>As m68k is not a release architecture, I don't care much what goes
>in debian/config/m68k (well, it had better not break gencontrol.py).
>Whatever the m68k porters come up with is fine.
OK, thanks. I’d kinda like to have it somewhat in sync with
the rest of Debian of course,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:29:11PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>
> >Kernel images fail to boot on Atari if they're bigger than 4 MiB.
>
> OK, thanks. What about the others (amiga, bvme*, mac, two mvme*)?
>
> Who’s in charge of the Debian kernel configs (IIRC Stephen
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:06:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > ARAnyM cannot boot the latest kernel images (still compiling,
> > but I copied out vmlinux.gz):
> >
> > tglase@tglase:~/stuff/aranym/vm2 $ ./run
> > R
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>Kernel images fail to boot on Atari if they're bigger than 4 MiB.
OK, thanks. What about the others (amiga, bvme*, mac, two mvme*)?
Who’s in charge of the Debian kernel configs (IIRC Stephen Marenka
and Wouter Verhelst)? Or otherwise, could the Debian Linux kernel
team
Hi Thorsten,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> ARAnyM cannot boot the latest kernel images (still compiling,
> but I copied out vmlinux.gz):
>
> tglase@tglase:~/stuff/aranym/vm2 $ ./run
> Running Ara2 on X11: :2
> ARAnyM 0.9.15
> Using config file: 'aranym.config.x11'
> Co
On 2013-05-13 14:38, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>> Could be a kernel issue with '060s.
> Thats what I want to hear! And now that our kernel hacker is
listening, what
> can we do to track this down and fix it?
If there are no problems with older kernels, you can try to bisect
it.
Ingo, what
Hi all,
ARAnyM cannot boot the latest kernel images (still compiling,
but I copied out vmlinux.gz):
tglase@tglase:~/stuff/aranym/vm2 $ ./run
Running Ara2 on X11: :2
ARAnyM 0.9.15
Using config file: 'aranym.config.x11'
Could not open joystick 0
ARAnyM RTC Timer: /dev/rtc: Permission denied
ARAnyM
I'm sorry. I was a little confused and jumped the gun on answering your
questions. I totally understand fixing processes to a specific CPU in that
scenerio. If you type in your CPU model i7 950 an Intel link called Intel
Arc will give you a bunch of the information I asked about like
hyperthreading
I don't mean to be a bother -- I am sincerely interested in figuring out this
puzzle.
I have a hunch but I'd like to verify a couple of things first --- how many VMs
are you running?
Thanks,
Britt
On May 11, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I’ve upgraded my desktop at wor
Hello,
What virtualization subsystem are you running? I have a i7 920 at home and it's
pretty fast.
The only thing I can think of is maybe your running into a scenario where your
VMs are pinned to threads that share the same CPU Core, and that might be
inducing a bottle-neck somewhere.
Just
Britton Dodd dixit:
>What virtualization subsystem are you running? I have a i7 920 at home
>and it's pretty fast.
ARAnyM on bare metal Debian/i386.
>The only thing I can think of is maybe your running into a scenario
>where your VMs are pinned to threads that share the same CPU Core, and
>that
Britton Dodd dixit:
>I have a hunch but I'd like to verify a couple of things first --- how
>many VMs are you running?
One, then two, then four. Doesn't make a change,
even the very first one had about half speed.
Although I think I only switched governors after
booting it. Maybe the first core w
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
> architectures with non-working java7.
Just asking as a loongson-2f user, :-)
What makes java7 not to work on those architectures? Building issues?
> ...
> So the
Hey Matthias
On 06/05/13 15:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
architectures with non-working java7.
+1
Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly
submitted by James Page. Some may be still lur
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>> Is it easy to trigger?
>
> No, unfortunately(?) not. I have the impression it happens more often when
> the load is high (or maybe when swap is used), but I don't have any proof
> for that. Sometimes every buildd-[uploader|watcher] f
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
>I'm afraid I can't let high-profile debian-m68k hackers play dangerous sports.
Hahaha!
You’re lucky, too many people are missing anyway.
Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>Well, I had this example last week where during two builds different test
>cases failed, and the th
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Christian T. Steigies
> wrote:
> >> > Well, I had this example last week where during two builds different test
> >> > cases failed, and the third build succeeded. If this is the hardware,
> >
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>> > Well, I had this example last week where during two builds different test
>> > cases failed, and the third build succeeded. If this is the hardware, what
>> > should I do, reseat the CPU? I think Michael gave me a spare 060 some t
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:26:13PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Christian T. Steigies
> wrote:
> >> Even GCC???s own ICE messages say so. It retries the compilation if it
> >> fails due to an ICE, automatically, and if it does _not_ fail again,
> >> the har
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>> Even GCC???s own ICE messages say so. It retries the compilation if it
>> fails due to an ICE, automatically, and if it does _not_ fail again,
>> the hardware is at fault. (Which may not necessarily be a problem
Or the OS.
>> with
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:43:00AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>
> >I know it is marked, but kullervo was idling and I was hoping that maybe a
> >native build could get rid of some of the ICEs and segfaults. You are not
>
> It won???t. I???ve seen these issues whi
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Can only get better. I hope the rain stops, we (cow-orkers) wanted
> to play football after work…
I'm sorry, Thorsten.
I'm afraid I can't let high-profile debian-m68k hackers play dangerous sports.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>I know it is marked, but kullervo was idling and I was hoping that maybe a
>native build could get rid of some of the ICEs and segfaults. You are not
It won’t. I’ve seen these issues while *running* the mksh testsuite
on it, which is totally separate from anything GC
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 07:42:49AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>
> >Thorsten mentioned something about a new toolchain which causes problems
> >with the buildds. I think I got that... kullervo could not install debhelper
> >because of libffi5, where it really wante
Christian T. Steigies dixit:
>Thorsten mentioned something about a new toolchain which causes problems
>with the buildds. I think I got that... kullervo could not install debhelper
>because of libffi5, where it really wanted libffi6. After installing about
Should be done now, as I’m uploading gli
Hi,
Thorsten mentioned something about a new toolchain which causes problems
with the buildds. I think I got that... kullervo could not install debhelper
because of libffi5, where it really wanted libffi6. After installing about
20 packages in the host system, I have the new debhelper, but in the b
27 matches
Mail list logo
