Hi!
After Elgar I've setup Vivaldi as well. It already successfully built bcron,
but I need to check mail settings. Next is Arrakis tomorrow.
I'm setting all buildds up the same way: schroot with LVM snapshots. We could
use btrfs snapshots as well, but I'm too unexperienced with btrfs, so I st
Satoru KURASHIKI dixit:
>Thank you for your suggestion.
>I will accept this change,
Thanks, you're welcome.
>> adep: [48]openjdk-6-jdk [not hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64
>> kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel s390x]
↑↑↑
>> I suggest to change it to:
>>
>> open
hi,
Thank you for your suggestion.
I will accept this change,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Since your current dependency is:
>
> adep: [48]openjdk-6-jdk [not hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel s390x]
> OpenJDK Developme
Ingo J�rgensmann dixit:
>This one is successful as well...
Right. I miss debian-ports-archive-keyring in the package list.
Without it you’ll not be able to get binary packages via SecureAPT,
and disabling the latter is not way to go.
You can probably kill: cpp-4.7 g++-4.7 gcc-4.7 libstdc++6-4.7
This one is successful as well...
Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
> Von: bui...@elgar.buildd.net
> Betreff: Log for successful build of pax_1:20120606-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)
> Datum: 20. Dezember 2012 19:18:55 MEZ
> An: i...@bluespice.org
>
pax_20120606-2_m68
Britt Dodd dixit:
>I'm aware of a unstable image that most are working from...but is there a
>stable "base" image that I can start from and update with?
No, unstable+unreleased is a moving target, and Debian sid, despite
its name, is not really instable ;-)
The current “base image” are my image
Greetings! I've been a long time listener now and I finally have my hands
on a 68k machine. It's a SE/30 with 64M ram (it'll go up to 128M ram) and a
2G hard drive. System7 on this is somewhat limited as far as usefulness,
and I have a very small collection of large SCSI hard drives I could
install
Ingo J�rgensmann dixit:
>Am 20.12.2012 um 15:19 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
>
>> Can you build pax_20120606-2 which has no Build-Depends at all?
>Fail-Stage: fetch-src
Huh. http://packages.debian.org/sid/pax
Ah. The version is 1:20120606-2 and I just looked at the filename
which omits the epoch.
Am 20.12.2012 um 15:19 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
> Can you build pax_20120606-2 which has no Build-Depends at all?
> That should show how minimal the chroot really is ;)
Fail-Stage: fetch-src
elgar:/org/chroots/buildd-sid# less etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/ unsta
Ingo J�rgensmann dixit:
>Successful build! Hooray! :-)
Cool ;)
Can you build pax_20120606-2 which has no Build-Depends at all?
That should show how minimal the chroot really is ;)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
cool ein Ada Lovelace Google-Doodle. aber zum 197. Geburtstag? Hätten
die nicht noch 3 Jahre
Simon Josefsson dixit:
>I just realized -- are you sure that you have sufficient entropy on the
>machine? Make sure the processes aren't stuck reading from
>/dev/*random.
Yes, I do. I’ve got a setup where I stream a BSD’s /dev/arandom (a
stretching RNG; the box itself has got an entropyKey so I’
Ingo J�rgensmann dixit:
>Maybe we can speed things up by installed some more packages like
>fakeroot and such in the chroot and don't let them installed by
>sbuild.
I’m currently cheating like this. pbuilder still tries to install
them, but it doesn’t take that long.
I’ve pre-installed:
• fakero
Successful build! Hooray! :-)
Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
> Von: bui...@elgar.buildd.net
> Betreff: Log for successful build of 6tunnel_0.11rc2-7 on m68k (dist=unstable)
> Datum: 20. Dezember 2012 12:16:10 MEZ
> An: i...@bluespice.org
>
6tunnel_0.11rc2-7_m68
I just realized -- are you sure that you have sufficient entropy on the
machine? Make sure the processes aren't stuck reading from
/dev/*random.
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Simon Josefsson dixit:
>
>>Can you try using gnutls-cli to see if the slowness is in the handshake
>>or the transfer or something else? Most benchmarks I've done and read
>>indicate GnuTLS is comparable to OpenSSL in speed -- there are no
>>dramatic differences, and eac
68k (dist=unstable)
> Datum: 20. Dezember 2012 10:43:38 MEZ
> An: i...@bluespice.org
>
6tunnel_0.11rc2-7_m68k-20121220-0941.build.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
> Build Architecture: m68k
> Build-Space: 540
> Build-Time: 334
> Distribution: unstable
> Fail-Stage: bu
16 matches
Mail list logo