Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results

2011-12-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Finn Thain dixit: >> I have just included it as the expected tests results. I have to say the >> list of failure seems to say that m68k is not really in a good state. Mh. I’m just the builder. >It might be worth running the tests on physical hardware instead of an >emulator. You just volunteer

Re: Cross Memory Attach v3

2011-12-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I’ve tested the below patch locally in the meantime, and it does not break anything. Aurelien Jarno dixit: >On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Andreas Schwab dixit: >> >> >Thorsten Glaser writes: >> > >> >> Index: eglibc-2.13/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/s

Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results

2011-12-16 Thread Finn Thain
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:47:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Just FYI, maybe you can do something with it (or not). > > I built the latest eglibc 2.13-23 without nocheck. > > > > I have just included it as the expected tests results. I have t

Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results

2011-12-16 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:47:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Just FYI, maybe you can do something with it (or not). > I built the latest eglibc 2.13-23 without nocheck. > I have just included it as the expected tests results. I have to say the list of failure seems to say that m68k is not r